Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 73, Revision 5 (FGE.73Rev5): consideration of alicyclic alcohols, aldehydes, acids and related esters evaluated by JECFA (59th, 63rd and 86th meeting) and structurally related to substances evaluated in FGE.12Rev5
Autor: | Trine Husøy, Gisela H. Degen, Agneta Oskarsson, Detlef Wölfle, Flavourings (Faf), Laurence Castle, Kevin Chipman, Claudia Bolognesi, Peter Moldeus, Romualdo Benigni, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Carla Martino, Maria Carfì, Maged Younes, Daniel Marzin, Paul Fowler, Camilla Svendsen, Karl-Heinz Engel, Rainer Gürtler, Wim Mennes, Gabriele Aquilina, Romina Shah, Peter Fürst, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Ine Waalkens-Berendsen, Eugenia Cordelli |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
food.ingredient
040301 veterinary sciences Daily intake Veterinary (miscellaneous) Group evaluation TP1-1185 Plant Science Detailed data 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Microbiology FGE.73 Rev4 0403 veterinary science Alicyclic compound food TX341-641 Food science JECFA Flavourings 0105 earth and related environmental sciences chemistry.chemical_classification Nutrition. Foods and food supply Chemical technology Food additive Dietary intake 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences α β‐unsaturated carbonyls Myrtenal chemistry Animal Science and Zoology Parasitology Stepwise approach Food Science Clearance |
Zdroj: | EFSA Journal, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2020) |
ISSN: | 1831-4732 |
Popis: | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 24 flavouring substances assigned to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 73 (FGE.73), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Twenty‐three substances have already been considered in FGE.73 and its four revisions ([FL‐no: 02.114, 02.141, 05.098, 05.112, 08.067, 09.289, 09.488, 09.534, 09.615, 05.119, 05.123, 08.034, 08.060, 09.028, 09.536, 05.104, 09.034, 09.712, 09.305, 02.060, 02.091, 09.278, 09.302]). The remaining substance myrtenal [FL‐no: 05.106] has been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.208Rev3 and is considered in this revision 5 of FGE.73. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach that integrates information on the structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern (TTC), and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel concluded that none of these 24 substances gives rise to safety concerns at their levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the ‘Maximised Survey‐derived Daily Intake’ (MSDI) approach. Besides the safety assessment of the flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered and found adequate for 23 substances. For [FL‐no: 09.278], the stereoisomeric composition is not specified. For two substances [FL‐no: 09.034, and 09.712], the modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake (mTAMDI) estimates are above the TTC for their structural class (I). For 17 substances evaluated through the Procedure, no normal and maximum use levels are available. Therefore, for these 19 substances, more detailed data on uses and use levels should be provided in order to refine their exposure assessments and to finalise their safety evaluations. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |