Perceived Ethicality of Guided Imagery in Rape Research
| Autor: | Michelle Aiello, Cynthia K. Shinabarger Reed, Jamess H. Korn, Timothy J. Huelsman |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1992 |
| Předmět: |
Risk
Social Psychology Research Subjects media_common.quotation_subject Poison control Violence Risk Assessment Suicide prevention Occupational safety and health Informed consent Reading (process) Injury prevention Humans Psychology Medicine Women Students General Psychology Guided imagery media_common Informed Consent business.industry Research Human factors and ergonomics Men Human Experimentation Attitude Evaluation Studies as Topic Research Design Rape Female business Sexuality Social psychology Stress Psychological Behavioral Research Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Ethics & Behavior. 2:1-14 |
| ISSN: | 1532-7019 1050-8422 |
| Popis: | In our first study, undergraduate students (30 men, 30 women) evaluated the ethical acceptability of two previously published studies that used guided imagery in rape situations. In one, women imagined themselves as rape victims; in the other, men imagined themselves as rapists. Most students rated the research acceptable, but there was a significant interaction (p less than .05): Women found the study of women as victim less ethical, and men found the study of men as rapist less ethical. In our second study, 30 noncollege women evaluated the research on women as rape victims. After reading the scenario, none of these women said they would have agreed to participate or thought the research was ethically acceptable. We discuss issues of informed consent, demands of the research situation, and potential benefits and risks. Language: en |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|