Preferences of adult patients with allergic rhinitis for the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate nasal sprays: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study
| Autor: | Anand A. Dalal, Jeffrey Leflein, Steven M. Meltzer, Jon E. Stahlman, Edward E. Philpot, Barbara A. Prillaman, Eli O. Meltzer, Junghee Lim |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Rhinitis Allergic Perennial medicine.medical_treatment Sensation Nasal congestion Fluticasone propionate law.invention Randomized controlled trial Double-Blind Method law Surveys and Questionnaires Anti-Allergic Agents Medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Nose Administration Intranasal Fluticasone Pharmacology Aerosols Cross-Over Studies business.industry Rhinitis Allergic Seasonal Middle Aged Crossover study United States Androstadienes Nasal Mucosa medicine.anatomical_structure Treatment Outcome Nasal spray Patient Satisfaction Anesthesia Sensory Thresholds Taste Odorants Nasal administration Female medicine.symptom business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Clinical therapeutics. 30(2) |
| ISSN: | 1879-114X |
| Popis: | Product attributes influence patient preference for intranasal corticosteroid therapy in allergic rhinitis (AR).The aim of the study was to compare the product sensory attributes and patient preferences of fluticasone furoate (FF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) nasal sprays in patients with symptomatic perennial and/or seasonal AR.This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study enrolled 127 patients with a diagnosis of AR as determined by respiratory symptoms and a positive skin test to perennial and/or seasonal allergens within 12 months prior to the study. Patients could not use FF or FP within 4 weeks prior to the start of the study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive FF (110 microg) followed by FP (200 microg) or FP followed by FF. A 10-minute washout period occurred before crossover dosing. Following each treatment, patient-rated sensory attributes were assessed immediately and 2 minutes after treatment on 2 questionnaires using a 7-point Likert scale (scored from 0-6) rating odor, taste, aftertaste, drip down the throat, urge to sneeze, soothing feeling, irritation, and nose runoff. At the end of the crossover dosing and after completion of the attributes questionnaires, preference for individual attributes of FF or FP nasal spray and overall patient preference were evaluated in a third questionnaire that asked "Based on these attributes, which product did you prefer overall?" Additionally, a follow-up phone call was conducted 24 hours after the study to assess any adverse events following study treatment.Patients (mean age, 39.7 years; 80% white; 65% women) preferred FF nasal spray over FP nasal spray overall (60% vs 33%; P = 0.003) and based on the individual attributes of odor (64% vs 29%; P0.001), taste (47% vs 21%; P0.001), aftertaste (44% vs 22%; P = 0.002), drip down the throat (43% vs 27%; P = 0.037), and nose runoff (49% vs 19%; P0.001). Patient ratings favored FF versus FP (median differences, P0.001) with respect to odor, taste, dripping down the throat, and nose runoff, both immediately and 2 minutes after dosing, but there were no significant differences with respect to whether the medication felt soothing, caused nasal irritation, or made patients sneeze. Fifty-two percent (63/121) of patients replied that they were very likely to comply with FF treatment versus FP treatment (38% [45/120]; P = 0.02) if the medications were prescribed. Three patients (2%) reported adverse events (dizziness, headache, nasal congestion) during treatment with FF.In this study of adult AR patients, the sensory attributes of FF were preferred over those of FP following single-dose administration. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect