Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science

Autor:	William E. Davis, Jessie Sun, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Jessica P. Lougheed, John M. Zelenski, D. Stephen Lindsay, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Matthew C. Makel, Matt E. Meier
Rok vydání:	2018
Předmět:	Psychological science business.industry 05 social sciences Internet privacy BF P-hacking 050109 social psychology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Psychology business Transparency (behavior) 050105 experimental psychology General Psychology
Zdroj:	Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 1:556-573
ISSN:	2515-2467 2515-2459
DOI:	10.1177/2515245918806489
Popis:	More and more psychological researchers have come to appreciate the perils of common but poorly justified research practices and are rethinking commonly held standards for evaluating research. As this methodological reform expresses itself in psychological research, peer reviewers of such work must also adapt their practices to remain relevant. Reviewers of journal submissions wield considerable power to promote methodological reform, and thereby contribute to the advancement of a more robust psychological literature. We describe concrete practices that reviewers can use to encourage transparency, intellectual humility, and more valid assessments of the methods and statistics reported in articles.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::623d5185cbec18d4037430e15e9b1250 https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918806489 Zobrazit plný text záznamu