Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low‐surgical‐risk patients: An updated meta‐analysis
| Autor: | Srilekha Chava, Robert Frankel, Bilal Malik, Umesh Gidwani, Sunny Goel, Jacob Shani, Karan Wats, Ravi Teja Pasam, Jignesh Patel, Joseph Gotesman |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Aortic valve replacement Valve replacement Risk Factors Internal medicine Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging 030212 general & internal medicine Stroke Aged Aged 80 and over Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation business.industry Incidence (epidemiology) Atrial fibrillation Aortic Valve Stenosis General Medicine Odds ratio medicine.disease Stenosis Treatment Outcome Cardiothoracic surgery Aortic Valve Heart Valve Prosthesis Cardiology Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 96:169-178 |
| ISSN: | 1522-726X 1522-1946 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.28520 |
| Popis: | OBJECTIVE The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low-surgical-risk patients. BACKGROUND TAVR is proven to be safe and effective in patients with high- and intermediate-risk aortic stenosis. However, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of TAVR in patients with low surgical risk. METHODS We conducted an electronic database search of all published data for studies that compared TAVR to SAVR in low-surgical-risk patients (mean society for thoracic surgery [STS] score |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text