Use of a Rapid Diagnostic for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae for Women in the Emergency Department Can Improve Clinical Management: Report of a Randomized Clinical Trial
| Autor: | Yu Hsiang Hsieh, Michele Corinne Ako, Mitra Lewis, Andrea F. Dugas, Richard E. Rothman, Charlotte A. Gaydos |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Chlamydia trachomatis Cervix Uteri Medical Overuse medicine.disease_cause Sensitivity and Specificity Article Specimen Handling law.invention Gonorrhea Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine Prevalence medicine Humans Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Positive test GeneXpert MTB/RIF business.industry Endocervical swab Standard of Care 030208 emergency & critical care medicine Emergency department Chlamydia Infections Length of Stay Middle Aged Neisseria gonorrhoeae Emergency Medicine Female Emergency Service Hospital business Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques |
| Zdroj: | Annals of Emergency Medicine. 74:36-44 |
| ISSN: | 0196-0644 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.012 |
| Popis: | Study objective In emergency departments (EDs), diagnosis and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are challenging. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess rapid C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing on overtreatment and undertreatment of women evaluated for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. Methods Women undergoing pelvic examinations and C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing (n=254) were randomized to control or rapid test groups. The control group received standard-of-care C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests of endocervical specimens, with 2- to 3-day turnaround times. For the rapid test group, clinicians collected an extra endocervical swab for GeneXpert C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae rapid testing, in addition to the standard-of-care nucleic acid amplification test swab. Rapid results were immediately provided, and all patients were treated according to providers’ clinical judgment. Results In the rapid test group, 7.9% of patients had positive test results for C trachomatis; 3.9% had positive test results for N gonorrhoeae. In the control standard-of-care group, 10.2% of patients had positive nucleic acid amplification test results for C trachomatis; 5.5% had positive results for N gonorrhoeae. Undertreatment for both C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in the ED was 0% for the rapid test group and 43.8% for the control standard-of-care group. Clinicians overtreated 46.5% of uninfected standard-of-care control patients for C trachomatis compared with 23.1% of uninfected rapid test patients. For patients uninfected with N gonorrhoeae, clinicians overtreated 46.7% of standard-of-care control patients compared with 25.4% of rapid test patients. The length of stay did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Rapid C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing in the ED led to a significant reduction in overtreatment for women without infections compared with the standard-of-care control group. Additionally, in the rapid test group there was significant improvement in appropriate treatment for patients with infections. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect