Effectiveness of Pelvic Physiotherapy in Children With Functional Constipation Compared With Standard Medical Care

Autor: Marc A. Benninga, Esther M.J. Bols, Rob A. de Bie, Wim A. Verwijs, Marieke L. van Engelenburg van Lonkhuyzen
Přispěvatelé: RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, Epidemiologie, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Paediatric Gastroenterology, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
FLOOR MUSCLE-ACTIVITY
Relaxation Therapy
THERAPY
law.invention
0302 clinical medicine
Quality of life
Randomized controlled trial
law
Pediatrician
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Single-Blind Method
Child
Defecation
Postural Balance
Pelvic floor
Toilet Training
Gastroenterology
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
Combined Modality Therapy
Exercise Therapy
medicine.anatomical_structure
Laxatives
Child
Preschool

SLOW-TRANSIT CONSTIPATION
DYSSYNERGIC DEFECATION
Female
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
DISORDERS
Breathing Exercises
Pelvis
03 medical and health sciences
Patient Education as Topic
030225 pediatrics
medicine
Humans
ATTITUDES
Physical Therapy Modalities
Hepatology
business.industry
Odds ratio
Pelvic Floor
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
BIOFEEDBACK
Musculoskeletal
CHILDHOOD CONSTIPATION
Quality of Life
Physical therapy
Functional constipation
business
Constipation
Zdroj: Gastroenterology, 152(1), 82-91. Elsevier Saunders
Gastroenterology, 152(1), 82-91. W.B. Saunders Ltd
ISSN: 1528-0012
0016-5085
Popis: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Functional constipation (FC) is a common childhood problem often related to pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. We compared the effectiveness of pelvic physiotherapy (PPT) vs standard medical care (SMC) in children with FC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 53 children (age, 5-16 y) with FC according to the Rome III criteria, at hospitals in The Netherlands from December 2009 to May 2014. Group allocation was concealed using a central computer system. SMC consisted of education, toilet training, and laxatives (n = 26), whereas PPT included SMC plus specific physiotherapeutic interventions (n = 27). Results were obtained from written reports from the subjects' pediatricians and parents. The primary outcome was absence of FC, according to Rome III criteria, after a 6-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were global perceived effect (range, 1-9; success was defined as a score >= 8), numeric rating scales assessing quality of life (parent and child; scale, 1-10), and the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). RESULTS: Treatment was effective for 92.3% of the children receiving PPT and for 63.0% of the children receiving SMC (adjusted odds ratio for success of PPT, 11.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-78.3) (P = .011). Significantly more children undergoing PPT stopped using laxatives (adjusted odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-26.4) (P = .009). Treatment success (based on global perceived effect) was achieved for 88.5% of subjects receiving PPT vs 33.3% of subjects receiving SMC) (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE