Colonic pouch confers better bowel function and similar postoperative outcomes compared to straight anastomosis for low rectal cancer
| Autor: | Ning-Hui Chai, Zhen-Zhou Chen, Yi-Dan Li, Wang Huang, Zheng-Qiang Wei |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Rectal resection syndrome Colonic pouch business.industry Bowel function Low anterior rectal resection 030230 surgery Anastomosis digestive system diseases Surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Low rectal cancer Retrospective Study Colonic Pouches Medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology business |
| Zdroj: | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery |
| ISSN: | 1948-9366 |
| DOI: | 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.303 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND With advancements in laparoscopic technology and the wide application of linear staplers, sphincter-saving procedures are increasingly performed for low rectal cancer. However, sphincter-saving procedures have led to the emergence of a unique clinical disorder termed anterior rectal resection syndrome. Colonic pouch anastomosis improves the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer > 7 cm from the anal margin. But whether colonic pouch anastomosis can reduce the incidence of rectal resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer is unknown. AIM To compare postoperative and oncological outcomes and bowel function of straight and colonic pouch anal anastomoses after resection of low rectal cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 72 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-saving procedures with either straight or colonic pouch anastomoses. Functional evaluations were completed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively. We also compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups that had undergone low or ultralow anterior rectal resection. RESULTS There were no significant differences in mean operating time, blood loss, time to first passage of flatus and excrement, and duration of hospital stay between the colonic pouch and straight anastomosis groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage following colonic pouch construction was lower (11.4% vs 16.2%) but not significantly different than that of straight anastomosis. Patients with colonic pouch construction had lower postoperative low anterior resection syndrome scores than the straight anastomosis group, suggesting better bowel function (preoperative: 4.71 vs 3.89, P = 0.43; 1 mo after surgery: 34.2 vs 34.7, P = 0.59; 6 mo after surgery: 22.70 vs 29.0, P < 0.05; 12 mo after surgery: 15.5 vs 19.5, P = 0.01). The overall recurrence and metastasis rates were similar (4.3% and 11.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Colonic pouch anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure for colorectal reconstruction after low and ultralow rectal resections. Moreover, colonic pouch construction may provide better functional outcomes compared to straight anastomosis. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|