Real-world Evaluation of Oral Vinorelbine in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: An ESME-MBC Study

Autor: Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Véronique D'Hondt, Audrey Mailliez, Gaëtane Simon, Damien Parent, Silvia Ilie, N. Madranges, Christelle Levy, David Pérol, Gaëlle Chenuc, Pierre Heudel, Thomas Vermeulin, Lionel Uwer, Paule Augereau, Thierry Petit, Suzette Delaloge, Florence Dalenc, Christophe Perrin, Etienne Brain, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Mathieu Robain, Marie-Paule Sablin
Přispěvatelé: Centre Jean Perrin [Clermont-Ferrand] (UNICANCER/CJP), UNICANCER, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Paul Strauss, CRLCC Paul Strauss
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Anticancer Research
Anticancer Research, International Institute of Anticancer Research, 2020, 40 (7), pp.3905-3913. ⟨10.21873/anticanres.14381⟩
ISSN: 0250-7005
Popis: Background/aim Vinorelbine is indicated for use in the treatment of MBC as a single agent or in combination but there is little real world data on this molecule and even less on its oral form. We exploited the Unicancer Epidemiology Strategy Medical-Economics (ESME) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) database to investigate current patterns of use of oral vinorelbine (OV), as well as outcomes of patients receiving this drug. Patients and methods Data were collected retrospectively from women and men treated for MBC between 2008 and 2014 at one of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. The efficacy of OV was evaluated in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and treatment duration. The population and patterns of OV usage were also described. Results A total of 1806 patients (11% of the ESME MBC database) were included in this analysis. OV was prescribed as monotherapy (46%) or in combination (29%), especially with capecitabine. mainly in later treatment lines. Median PFS was 3.3 months: 2.9 months for single agent, 3.6 months for combination therapy. Median OS was 40.9 months. Conclusion Real-world data offer complementary results to the data from traditional clinical trials, but they concern a much larger population. In this ESME MBC cohort, OV was only prescribed to a small subset of MBC patients. OV was mainly given as single agent to patients with heavily pre-treated MBC; less commonly, it was co-administered with capecitabine or anti-HER2, in earlier lines of therapy. PFS was modest but in line with previous reports.
Databáze: OpenAIRE