Transmyocardial laser revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting: A multicenter, blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Autor: | Fidel Realyvasques, Tommy L. Fudge, Keith B. Allen, Douglas Schuch, Robert D. Dowling, Anthony J. DelRossi, Mark Mostovych, Szabolc Szentpetery, Carl J. Shaar, Edward A. Lefrak, Thomas A. Pfeffer |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Předmět: |
Male
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Revascularization Angina Postoperative Complications Internal medicine Multicenter trial Myocardial Revascularization medicine Humans Single-Blind Method Prospective Studies Derivation Myocardial infarction Coronary Artery Bypass Prospective cohort study business.industry Middle Aged medicine.disease Transmyocardial revascularization Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Exercise Test Cardiology Female Laser Therapy Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery |
Zdroj: | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. (3):540-549 |
ISSN: | 0022-5223 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70134-6 |
Popis: | Objective: We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of transmyocardial revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients not amenable to complete revascularization by coronary bypass alone. Methods: A total of 263 patients whose standard of care was coronary artery bypass grafting and who had one or more ischemic areas not amenable to bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to receive coronary bypass of suitable vessels plus transmyocardial revascularization to areas not graftable (n = 132) or coronary bypass alone with nongraftable areas left unrevascularized (n = 131). Group preoperative demographics and operative characteristics were similar. Results: The operative mortality rate after coronary bypass/transmyocardial revascularization was 1.5% (2/132) versus 7.6% (10/131) after coronary bypass alone ( P = .02). Patients undergoing both coronary bypass and transmyocardial revascularization required less postoperative inotropic support (30% vs 55%, P = .0001) and had a trend toward fewer insertions of intra-aortic balloon pumps (4% vs 8%, P = .13) than did patients having coronary bypass alone. Multivariable predictors of operative mortality were coronary artery bypass alone (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-25.7; P = .04) and increased age (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2; P = .03). One-year Kaplan-Meier survival (95% vs 89%, P = .05) and freedom from major adverse cardiac events defined as death or myocardial infarction (92% vs 86%, P = .09) favored the combination of coronary bypass and transmyocardial revascularization. Baseline to 12-month improvement in angina and exercise treadmill scores was similar between groups. Conclusions: In a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, transmyocardial revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients not amenable to complete revascularization by coronary bypass alone was safe; however, angina relief and exercise treadmill improvement were indistinguishable between groups at 12 months of follow-up. Operative and 1-year survival benefits observed after adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization require confirmation by a larger validation study, which is ongoing. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:540-9) |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |