Assuming Rater Reliability Of A Movement Competency Screen - Is It True?
| Autor: | Kerry Mann, Nicholas O'Dwyer, Stephen Bird, Suzi Edwards |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
Research methodology
Applied psychology Social benefits Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Learning effect Reliability engineering 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Sample size determination Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Psychology Reliability (statistics) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
| Zdroj: | Charles Sturt University |
| Popis: | Due to the substantial financial and social benefits of reducing injury prevalence, movement competency screen (MCS) is an extremely common tool utilised across all levels of the sporting community. A key requirement of a MCS is that it must be reliable, and although previous research has claimed various MCS demonstrate good rater reliability, there are major limitations in this previous research methodology including low sample size and inappropriate statistical methods. This study therefore aims to determine the reliability of a field-based MCS in novice and expert raters, and determine if there is a learning effect present for both rater and participant. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|