Soil carbon sequestration in grazing systems: managing expectations
Autor: | Cecile Godde, Imke J.M. de Boer, Adrian Müller, Pete Smith, Christian Schader, Mario Herrero, Hannah H. E. van Zanten, Corina E. van Middelaar, Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen, Tara Garnett, Elin Röös |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Atmospheric Science
Livestock 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences 0208 environmental biotechnology Climate change 02 engineering and technology Air and water emissions Animal husbandry 01 natural sciences Animal Production Systems Environmental protection Grazing 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Dierlijke Productiesystemen Global and Planetary Change Global warming Soil carbon 020801 environmental engineering Greenhouse gases Grasslands Greenhouse gas WIAS Soil carbon sequestration Food systems Environmental science Cattle |
Zdroj: | Climatic Change Climatic Change (2020) |
ISSN: | 1573-1480 0165-0009 |
Popis: | Grazing systems emit greenhouse gases, which can, under specific agro-ecological conditions, be partly or entirely offset by soil carbon sequestration. However, any sequestration is time-limited, reversible, and at a global level outweighed by emissions from grazing systems. Thus, grazing systems are globally a net contributor to climate change and the time scale of key processes needs to be factored into any mitigation efforts. Failing to do so leads to unrealistic expectations of soil carbon management in grazing systems as a mitigation strategy. Protecting the large carbon stocks in grazing lands is also essential in order to avoid further climate change from additional CO2 release. Despite the time-limited and reversible nature of soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands, sequestration should be promoted in cases where it delivers environmental and agronomic benefits as well as for its potential, particularly on degraded land, to increase the feasibility of limiting global warming to less than 2 or preferably 1.5 °C. Some peer-reviewed sequestration estimates are of a similar order of magnitude to other food systems mitigation options over a 10–20 years period, such as reducing food loss and waste by 15% or aligning diets with current health related dietary-recommendations. However, caution should be applied to such comparisons since mitigation estimates are associated with large uncertainties and will ultimately depend on the economic cost-benefit relation, feasibility of implementation and time frame considered. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |