Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in the management of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
| Autor: | Ch. K. V. L. S. N. Anjana Male, H. Shylaja, Gollapalle Lakshminarayanashastry Viswanatha |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Mechanical ventilation
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Immunology MEDLINE Retrospective cohort study Placebo Antibodies Monoclonal Humanized COVID-19 Drug Treatment chemistry.chemical_compound Tocilizumab chemistry Rheumatology Internal medicine Meta-analysis medicine Risk of mortality Humans Immunology and Allergy Observational study business Retrospective Studies |
| Zdroj: | Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: one year in review 2022. 40:634-646 |
| ISSN: | 1593-098X 0392-856X |
| Popis: | BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).MethodsThe electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Google scholar to identify the retrospective observational reports. The studies published from 01 January 2020 to 30th September 2020. Participants were hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Interventions included tocilizumab versus placebo/standard of care. The comparison will be between TCZ versus standard of care (SOC)/placebo. Inconsistency between the studies was evaluated with I2 and quality of the evidences were evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa scale.ResultsBased on the inclusion criteria there were 24 retrospective studies involving 5686 subjects were included. The outcomes of the meta-analysis have revealed that the TCZ has reduced the mortality (M-H,RE-OR −0.11(−0.18 to −0.04) 95% CI, p =0.001, I2 =88%) and increased the incidences of super-infections (M-H, RE-OR 1.49(1.13 to 1.96) 95% CI, p=0.004, I2=47%). However, there is no significant difference in ICU admissions rate (M-H, RE-OR −0.06(−0.23 to 0.12), I2=93%), need of MV (M-H, RE-OR of 0.00(−0.06 to 0.07), I = 74%), LOS (IV −2.86(−0.91 to 3.38), I2=100%), LOS-ICU (IV: −3.93(−12.35 to 4.48), I2=100%), and incidences of pulmonary thrombosis (M-H, RE-OR 1.01 (0.45 to 2.26), I2=0%) compared to SOC/control.ConclusionBased on cumulative low to moderate certainty evidence shows that TCZ could reduce the risk of mortality in hospitalized patients. However, there is no statistically significant difference observed between the TCZ and SOC/control groups in other parameters. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|