Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design
| Autor: | Jennifer Hill, Graham Tomkins Feeny, Elaine R. Hitchcock, Tara McAllister, Jonathan L. Preston, Nina R. Benway |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Linguistics and Language
medicine.medical_specialty Randomization Adolescent medicine.medical_treatment Speech Therapy Residual Biofeedback behavioral disciplines and activities Speech Sound Disorder Random Allocation 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Speech and Hearing 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation otorhinolaryngologic diseases Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Humans Speech Child Research Articles American English Biofeedback Psychology United States Otorhinolaryngology 0305 other medical science Psychology psychological phenomena and processes 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Am J Speech Lang Pathol |
| ISSN: | 1558-9110 1058-0360 1488-1101 |
| Popis: | Purpose Research comparing different biofeedback types could lead to individualized treatments for those with residual speech errors. This study examines within-treatment response to ultrasound and visual-acoustic biofeedback, as well as generalization to untrained words, for errors affecting the American English rhotic /ɹ/. We investigated whether some children demonstrated greater improvement in /ɹ/ during ultrasound or visual-acoustic biofeedback. Each participant received both biofeedback types. Individual predictors of treatment response (i.e., age, auditory-perceptual skill, oral somatosensory skill, and growth mindset) were also explored. Method Seven children ages 9–16 years with residual rhotic errors participated in 10 treatment visits. Each visit consisted of two conditions: 45 min of ultrasound biofeedback and 45 min of visual-acoustic biofeedback. The order of biofeedback conditions was randomized within a single-case experimental design. Acquisition of /ɹ/ was evaluated through acoustic measurements (normalized F3–F2 difference) of selected nonbiofeedback productions during practice. Generalization of /ɹ/ was evaluated through acoustic measurements and perceptual ratings of pretreatment/posttreatment probes. Results Five participants demonstrated acquisition of practiced words during the combined treatment package. Three participants demonstrated a clinically significant degree of generalization to untreated words on posttreatment probes. Randomization tests indicated one participant demonstrated a significant advantage for visual-acoustic over ultrasound biofeedback. Participants' auditory-perceptual acuity on an /ɹ/−/w/ identification task was identified as a possible correlate of generalization following treatment. Conclusions Most participants did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in acoustic productions between the ultrasound and visual-acoustic conditions, but one participant showed greater improvement in /ɹ/ during visual-acoustic biofeedback. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14881101 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|