Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Understand Patient Burden: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Autor: | Samir Benosman, Dawn Gibson, Stephen Doogan, John Heid, Prashanth Sunkureddi, Yujin Park |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Patient insights Mental impairment Impulsivity Continuous assessment 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Rheumatology Cost of Illness Outcome Assessment Health Care medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Spondylitis Ankylosing 030212 general & internal medicine Disease burden Original Research 030203 arthritis & rheumatology Ankylosing spondylitis Internet Patient-reported outcomes Narration business.industry Information Dissemination Communication General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Real-world data Clinical trial Patient burden Family medicine Anxiety Female Self Report medicine.symptom business |
Zdroj: | Advances in Therapy |
ISSN: | 1865-8652 0741-238X |
Popis: | Introduction Online communities contain a wealth of information containing unsolicited patient experiences that may go beyond what is captured by guided surveys or patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in clinical settings. This study described patient experiences reported online to better understand the day-to-day disease burden of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods Unguided, English-language patient narratives reported between January 2010 and May 2016 were collected from 52 online sources (e.g., general/health social networking sites, patient–physician Q&A sites, AS forums). Using natural language processing combined with manual curation, patient-reported experiences within narratives were evaluated and categorized into social, physical, emotional, cognitive, and role activity (SPEC-R) concepts to assess functional impairment. The same SPEC-R categorization was applied to 5 AS-specific PRO instruments to evaluate their coverage of concepts extracted from patient narratives. Results A total of 34,780 narratives from 3449 patients with AS were included. Physical aspects of AS (e.g., pain and mobility) were most commonly reported by patients (86.7%), followed by emotional (32.5%), cognitive (23.6%), role activity (8.7%) and social (5.1%). Some frequently discussed subconcepts were effectively captured by ≥ 2 PRO instruments, such as pain (65.3%), asthenia (19.9%), musculoskeletal impairment (19.9%), depression (9.9%), and anger/frustration (5.4%); others [e.g., anxiety (19.1%), mental impairment (3.2%), impulsivity (2.9%)] were not addressed by any of the PRO instruments. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of analyzing patient experiences beyond clinical trial settings and physician reports; continuous assessment of existing PRO instruments in collaboration with patients may increase their utility in real-world settings. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0669-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |