The Modal—Amodal Distinction in the Debate on Conceptual Format
| Autor: | Sabrina Haimovici |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
CONCEPTS
Relation (database) media_common.quotation_subject grounded cognition Face (sociological concept) 050105 experimental psychology mental representations concepts sensorimotor systems symbols approximate number representations MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine History and Philosophy of Science Perception APPROXIMATE NUMBER REPRESENTATIONS GROUNDED COGNITION Neural system 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences lcsh:BC1-199 Grounded cognition lcsh:B1-5802 SENSORIMOTOR SYSTEMS media_common Cognitive science SYMBOLS purl.org/becyt/ford/6 [https] lcsh:Philosophy (General) 05 social sciences Amodal perception lcsh:Logic purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 [https] Philosophy Modal Mental representation Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas instacron:CONICET Philosophies, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 7-0 (2018) Philosophies; Volume 3; Issue 2; Pages: 7 |
| Popis: | In this paper, I review the main criteria offered for distinguishing the modal and amodal approaches to conceptual format: the type of input to which the representations respond, the relation they bear to perceptual states, and the specific neural systems to which they belong. I evaluate different interpretations of them and argue that they all face difficulties. I further show that they lead to cross-classifications of certain types of representations, using approximate number representations as an example. Fil: Haimovici, Sabrina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|