Soil enzyme activities recovery after organic treatments of degrated aeras within vineyards

Autor: Lagomarsino, A., Agnelli, A.E., Fulchin, E., Giffard, B.
Přispěvatelé: Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (CREA), Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin (ISVV), Santé et agroécologie du vignoble (UMR SAVE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin (ISVV)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: EQA (Imola) : environmental quality;qualité de l'Environnement;qualità ambientale
EQA (Imola) : environmental quality;qualité de l'Environnement;qualità ambientale, 2018, 31, pp.17-25. ⟨10.6092/ISSN.2281-4485/7891⟩
EQA, Vol 31, Iss 0, Pp 17-25 (2018)
EQA (31), 17-25. (2018)
ISSN: 2039-9898
DOI: 10.6092/ISSN.2281-4485/7891⟩
Popis: Soil enzymes were used to assess the impact of different treatments applied in four farms, each one with three vineyards as replicates, on soil functionality. 8 enzymes related to C, N, S and P cycling were measured and functional diversity indexes were estimated. Three treatments were compared: compost, green manure and dry mulching with respect to degraded and non-degraded soil. The four vineyards showed different enzymatic patterns and response to treatments. Vineyards with the largest difference between degraded and non-degraded soil have benefited more largely from the treatments. In particular, dry mulching seemed to be more effective than green manure or compost, with the exception of San Disdagio. However, the effect the short term.
EQA - International Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 31 (2018): Soil health and strategies in vineyard (II)
Databáze: OpenAIRE