Risk acceptance in composite-tissue allotransplantation reconstructive procedures
Autor: | Osborne Wiggins, Ramsey Majzoub, Deepak Naidu, Michael Cunningham, Serge Martinez, Allen Furr, Claudio Maldonado, Pascal Brouha, Gustavo Perez-Abadia, Joseph C. Banis, Cedric G. Francois, Federico V. Grossi, Moshe Kon, John H. Barker |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2006 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent medicine.medical_treatment Hand Transplantation Risk Assessment Quality of life medicine Humans Transplantation Homologous Risk acceptance Intensive care medicine Aged Aged 80 and over Foot business.industry Immunosuppression Organ Transplantation Middle Aged Plastic Surgery Procedures Kidney Transplantation Surgery Transplantation Composite Tissue Allotransplantation Face Healthy individuals Relative risk Multivariate Analysis Tissue Transplantation Female Larynx business Allotransplantation |
Zdroj: | Microsurgery. 26:144-149 |
ISSN: | 1098-2752 0738-1085 |
DOI: | 10.1002/micr.20227 |
Popis: | Composite-tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a new therapeutic modality to reconstruct major tissue defects of the face, larynx, and extremities. Unlike most life-saving organ-transplantation procedures, CTA is considered to improve quality of life. Therefore, the question arises, do the risks posed by the immunosuppression drugs that patients must take to prevent rejection justify the benefits of these procedures? The purpose of this study was to assess the relative risk that individuals are willing to accept in order to receive the benefits of CTA procedures. We used a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument to question two primary populations of individuals: those who live with the risks of immunosuppression, and healthy individuals. The level of risk acceptance for the seven transplant procedures tested (foot, single hand, double hand, larynx, kidney, hemiface, and full face) showed significant differences in research participants' risk acceptance for the different transplant procedures, but no significant differences between groups. Based on these findings, we conclude that certain CTA procedures convey benefits to recipients that are perceived by subjects, including individuals who live with the risks of immunosuppression, to warrant the risks of these procedures. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |