A Multicenter Trial Demonstrating Presence or Absence of Bacterial Contamination at the Screw-Bone Interface Owing to Absence or Presence of Pedicle Screw Guard, Respectively, During Spinal Fusion
| Autor: | Vijay K. Goel, Sandeep Gidvani, Ashish G Agarwal, Boren Lin, Hossein Elgafy, Von Sigler, Anand K. Agarwal, Christian Schultz, Steve Garfin, Chris Karas, Jeffrey C. Wang, Neel Anand, Aakash Agarwal |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
musculoskeletal diseases
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment India California Bioburden 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pedicle Screws Multicenter trial Humans Surgical Wound Infection Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Prospective Studies Pedicle screw Ohio 030222 orthopedics Guard (information security) business.industry Contamination musculoskeletal system equipment and supplies Surgery Spinal Fusion surgical procedures operative Multicenter study Spinal fusion Equipment Contamination Spinal Diseases Neurology (clinical) Implant business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 33:E364-E368 |
| ISSN: | 2380-0186 |
| Popis: | Study design A prospective multicenter study. Objective The objective of this study was to assess bacterial contamination in current practices of pedicle screw handling and comparing it to a novel method of using an intraoperative, sterile implant guard for screws. Summary of background data Postoperative infections occur at the higher end of 2%-13%, as cited in the literature, and are underestimated due to various reasons in such publications. Despite concerns associated with vancomycin application immediately before closure, it is theoretically impossible to irrigate the screw-bone interface postimplantation. Consequently, any contamination of pedicle screw before implantation is permanent, and has the potential to cause deep-bone infection, or hardware loosening due to encapsulation of biofilm between the bone and the screw. Therefore, continued vigilance and effective preventive measures should be undertaken if available. Materials and methods Two groups of presterile individually-packaged pedicle screws, one incased in a sterile, protective guard (group 1: G) and the other without such a guard (group 2: NG), 31 samples in each group were distributed over 28 spinal fusion surgeries at 5 independent hospitals groups. Each were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Twenty minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site, handles the pedicle screw, to check the fit with the insertion device. Then, instead of implantation, it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh sterile gloves for bacterial analysis. Results The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10 to 10 colonies forming units per screw, whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden. Conclusion Standard, current, handling of pedicle screws leads to bacterial contamination, which can be avoided if the screws are sterilely prepackaged with an intraoperative guard (preinstalled). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|