Effectiveness and surface changes of different decontamination protocols at smooth and minimally rough titanium surfaces
| Autor: | Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant´Ana, Masazumi Nagai, David M. Kim, Chia-Yu Chen, Vitor de Toledo Stuani |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Materials science Surface Properties Scanning electron microscope chemistry.chemical_element Surface finish 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Surface roughness Decontamination Titanium Bacteria Chlorhexidine MICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICA DE VARREDURA 030206 dentistry Human decontamination 030104 developmental biology chemistry Ultrapure water Microscopy Electron Scanning Periodontics Wetting medicine.drug Nuclear chemistry |
| Zdroj: | Repositório Institucional da USP (Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
| ISSN: | 1943-3670 0022-3492 |
| Popis: | The objective of this study is to evaluate titanium decontamination after different protocols while assessing changes in surface roughness, chemical composition, and wettability.Ninety-six smooth (S) and 96 minimally rough (R) titanium microimplants were used. Pristine microimplants were reserved for negative control (S-nC/R-nC, n = 9), while the remaining microimplants were incubated in Escherichia coli culture. Non-decontaminated microimplants were used as positive control (S-pC/R-pC, n = 3). The other microimplants were divided into seven different decontamination protocols (12 S/R per group): 24% EDTA, 2% chlorhexidine (CHL), gauze soaked in 2% chlorhexidine (GCHL), gauze soaked in ultrapure water (GMQ), scaling (SC), titanium brush (TiB), and implantoplasty (IP). Contaminated areas were assessed by scanning electron microscope images, chemical composition by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, wettability by meniscus technique, and roughness by an optical profiler.Higher residual bacteria were observed in R-pC compared with S-pC (P 0.0001). When comparing S and R with their respective pC groups, the best results were obtained with GCHL, SC, TiB, and IP, with no difference between these protocols (P 0.05). Changes in surface roughness were observed after all treatments, with S/R-IP presenting the smoother and a less hydrophilic surface (P 0.05). Apart from IP protocol, all the other groups presented a more hydrophilic surface in R than in S microimplants (P 0.003). All decontamination protocols resulted in a lower percentage of superficial Ti when compared with S/R-nC (P 0.002).All decontamination protocols resulted in changes in roughness, wettability, and chemical composition, but GCHL, SC, TiB, an IP presented the best decontamination outcomes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text