Diabetes causal attributions among affected and unaffected individuals
Autor: | Margaret K Rose, Rachel W Cohen, Sarah E Boland, Susan Persky, Kristi A. Costabile |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Research design
Adult Male Disease status endocrine system Health Knowledge Attitudes Practice endocrine system diseases type 1 diabetes Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Health Status Health Behavior 050109 social psychology Type 2 diabetes Psychosocial Research 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine immune system diseases Diabetes mellitus Surveys and Questionnaires Activities of Daily Living medicine Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 030212 general & internal medicine Internal-External Control illness perceptions Type 1 diabetes business.industry 05 social sciences Public health education nutritional and metabolic diseases Middle Aged medicine.disease 3. Good health lay beliefs Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Case-Control Studies Respondent causal attributions Female type 2 diabetes Attribution business Clinical psychology Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care |
ISSN: | 2052-4897 |
Popis: | ObjectiveThe present study aims to describe and compare causal attributions for type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) among affected and unaffected individuals and to investigate the relationships among attributions, attitudes, and beliefs.Research design and methodsAdults with no diabetes (N=458), T1D (N=192), or T2D (N=207) completed an online survey. Measures assessed diabetes conceptual knowledge, causal attributions for T1D and T2D, perceived control over diabetes onset, and favorability judgements of individuals affected by each type.ResultsResults indicate general agreement on causal attributions for T1D and T2D among all respondent groups, with some divergences by disease status. All respondents attributed both T1D and T2D to genetics, and genetic attributions were positively associated with favorability judgements of individuals with T2D, but not those with T1D.ConclusionsThis report sets the stage for investigations into how and why attributions for T1D and T2D differ and the implications of these differences including stigmatization of individuals with diabetes and diabetes-related self-concept. Additionally, this work can inform efforts towards clinical and public health education to prevent and optimize treatment of T1D and T2D. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |