Different effects of acarbose and glibenclamide on proinsulin and insulin profiles in people with Type 2 diabetes
Autor: | M Menschikowski, Markolf Hanefeld, S.M Haffner, Carsta Koehler, Theodora Temelkova-Kurktschiev, J. Wildbrett, Sabine Fischer |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2002 |
Předmět: |
Blood Glucose
Male medicine.medical_specialty Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism medicine.medical_treatment Type 2 diabetes Body Mass Index Glibenclamide Placebos Endocrinology Double-Blind Method Diabetes mellitus Internal medicine Glyburide Internal Medicine medicine Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Insulin Proinsulin Acarbose Meal business.industry Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus General Medicine Fasting Middle Aged medicine.disease Postprandial Period Circadian Rhythm Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Female business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Diabetes research and clinical practice. 55(3) |
ISSN: | 0168-8227 |
Popis: | In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the effect of acarbose (A) and glibenclamide (G) on post-prandial (pp) and 24-h profiles of proinsulin and insulin.Twenty-seven patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled with diet alone were randomised to receive acarbose, 100 mg thrice daily, glibenclamide, 1 mg thrice daily, or placebo. Before and after 16 weeks of treatment, 24-h profiles of proinsulin, insulin and glucose (fasting, 1 h after breakfast and every 3-h for a 24-h period) were measured under metabolic ward conditions with standardised meals.With acarbose, a reduced 24-h level of proinsulin was observed compared with glibenclamide (AUC 1096 +/- 118 vs. 1604 +/- 174 pmol/l per h, P0.05) at 16 weeks. The breakfast increment of proinsulin was lower with acarbose than glibenclamide (6.8 vs. 19.3 pmol/l, P0.05) as was the level at that time (37.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 56.4 +/- 7.5 pmol/l, P0.05). A lower AUC of insulin after treatment was also observed with acarbose than glibenclamide (7.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 14.8 +/- 4.5 nmol/l per h, P0.05), as also for 1-h increment (81 +/- 26, vs. 380 +/- 120 pmol/l, P0.01) and 1-h level (325 +/- 30 vs. 621 +/- 132 pmol/l, P0.01). Acarbose reduced 1-h breakfast glucose increment (baseline 6.3 +/- 0.6, 16-week 3.5 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P0.01) and 1-h glucose level (18.1 +/- 1.1 and 14.5 +/- 1.3 mmol/l, P0.01), whereas glibenclamide did not (6.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 5.4 +/- 0.6 mmol/l and 18.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 15.3 +/- 1.3 mmol/l).Measurement of circadian excursions of proinsulin and insulin reveals distinct differences in meal-time proinsulin and insulin increment and level between acarbose and glibenclamide whereas fasting levels of these insulin fractions remained unaffected. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
Pro tento záznam nejsou dostupné žádné jednotky.