The polysemous concepts of psychomotricity and catatonia: A European multi-consensus perspective

Autor: Jack R. Foucher, Ludovic C. Jeanjean, Clément C. de Billy, Bruno Pfuhlmann, Julie M.E. Clauss, Alexandre Obrecht, Olivier Mainberger, Remi Vernet, Hippolyte Arcay, Benoit Schorr, Sébastien Weibel, Sebastian Walther, Peter N. van Harten, John L. Waddington, Manuel J. Cuesta, Victor Peralta, Lucile Dupin, Fabio Sambataro, Manuel Morrens, Katharina M. Kubera, Lydia E. Pieters, Katharina Stegmayer, Werner Strik, R. Christian Wolf, Burkhard E. Jabs, Miriam Ams, Claudio Garcia, Markus Hanke, Julien Elowe, Andreas Bartsch, Fabrice Berna, Dusan Hirjak
Přispěvatelé: Laboratoire des sciences de l'ingénieur, de l'informatique et de l'imagerie (ICube), École Nationale du Génie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement de Strasbourg (ENGEES)-Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Strasbourg (INSA Strasbourg), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Matériaux et Nanosciences Grand-Est (MNGE), Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar (Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar (Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA))-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Réseau nanophotonique et optique, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar (Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA))-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Neuropsychologie Cognitive et Physiopathologie de la Schizophrénie (NCPS), Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg, Psychiatrie & Neuropsychologie, RS: MHeNs - R2 - Mental Health
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Neuropsychopharmacology
European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022, 56, ⟨10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.11.008⟩
European Neuropsychopharmacology, 56, 60-73. Elsevier
European neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN: 1873-7862
0924-977X
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.11.008⟩
Popis: Current classification systems use the terms "catatonia" and "psychomotor phenomena" as mere a-theoretical descriptors, forgetting about their theoretical embedment. This was the source of misunderstandings among clinicians and researchers of the European collaboration on movement and sensorimotor/psychomotor functioning in schizophrenia and other psychoses or ECSP. Here, we review the different perspectives, their historical roots and highlight discrepancies. In 1844, Wilhelm Griesinger coined the term "psychic-motor" to name the physiological process accounting for volition. While deriving from this idea, the term "psychomotor" actually refers to systems that receive miscellaneous intrapsychic inputs, convert them into coherent behavioral outputs send to the motor systems. More recently, the sensorimotor approach has drawn on neuroscience to redefine the motor signs and symptoms observed in psychoses. In 1874, Karl Kahlbaum conceived catatonia as a brain disease emphasizing its somatic - particularly motor - features. In conceptualizing dementia praecox Emil Kraepelin rephrased catatonic phenomena in purely mental terms, putting aside motor signs which could not be explained in this way. Conversely, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard school pursued Kahlbaum's neuropsychiatric approach and described many new psychomotor signs, e.g. parakinesias, Gegenhalten. They distinguished 8 psychomotor phenotypes of which only 7 are catatonias. These barely overlap with consensus classifications, raising the risk of misunderstanding. Although coming from different traditions, the authors agreed that their differences could be a source of mutual enrichment, but that an important effort of conceptual clarification remained to be made. This narrative review is a first step in this direction. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: