Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction
| Autor: | Jacqueline-Marie N. Ferland, Anthony G. Phillips, Wendy K. Adams, Tristan J Hynes, Catharine A. Winstanley, Celine D Hounjet, Cole Vonder Haar, David Lindenbach |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Dopamine media_common.quotation_subject Drug-Seeking Behavior Nucleus accumbens Nucleus Accumbens 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Cocaine Reward medicine Animals Rats Long-Evans Reinforcement Research Articles media_common Cued speech General Neuroscience Addiction medicine.disease Iowa gambling task 030227 psychiatry Behavior Addictive Substance abuse Acoustic Stimulation Gambling Cues Psychology Self-administration Neuroscience Locomotion Photic Stimulation 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Addiction vulnerability |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Neuroscience. 39:1842-1854 |
| ISSN: | 1529-2401 0270-6474 |
| DOI: | 10.1523/jneurosci.3477-17.2018 |
| Popis: | Rats trained to perform a version of the rat gambling task (rGT) in which salient audiovisual cues accompany reward delivery, similar to commercial gambling products, show greater preference for risky options. Given previous demonstrations that probabilistic reinforcement schedules can enhance psychostimulant-induced increases in accumbal DA and locomotor activity, we theorized that performing this cued task could perpetuate a proaddiction phenotype. Significantly more rats developed a preference for the risky options in the cued versus uncued rGT at baseline, and this bias was further exacerbated by cocaine self-administration, whereas the choice pattern of optimal decision-makers was unaffected. The addition of reward-paired cues therefore increased the proportion of rats exhibiting a maladaptive cognitive response to cocaine self-administration. Risky choice was not associated with responding for conditioned reinforcement or a marker of goal/sign-tracking, suggesting that reward-concurrent cues precipitate maladaptive choice via a unique mechanism unrelated to simple approach toward, or responding for, conditioned stimuli. Although “protected” from any resulting decision-making impairment, optimal decision-makers trained on the cued rGT nevertheless self-administered more cocaine than those trained on the uncued task. Collectively, these data suggest that repeated engagement with heavily cued probabilistic reward schedules can drive addiction vulnerability through multiple behavioral mechanisms. Rats trained on the cued rGT also exhibited blunted locomotor sensitization and lower basal accumbal DA levels, yet greater cocaine-induced increases in accumbal DA efflux. Gambling in the presence of salient cues may therefore result in an adaptive downregulation of the mesolimbic DA system, rendering individuals more sensitive to the deleterious effects of taking cocaine.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTImpaired cost/benefit decision making, exemplified by preference for the risky, disadvantageous options on the Iowa Gambling Task, is associated with greater risk of relapse and treatment failure in substance use disorder. Understanding factors that enhance preference for risk may help elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying maladaptive decision making in addiction, thereby improving treatment outcomes. Problem gambling is also highly comorbid with substance use disorder, and many commercial gambling products incorporate salient win-paired cues. Here we show that adding reward-concurrent cues to a rat analog of the IGT precipitates a hypodopaminergic state, characterized by blunted accumbal DA efflux and attenuated locomotor sensitization, which may contribute to the enhanced responsivity to uncertain rewards or the reinforcing effects of cocaine we observed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|