Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
| Autor: | Joaquim Radua, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Stefan Borgwardt |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Neurology Cognitive Neuroscience Behavioral therapy Neuroimaging Guidelines lcsh:RC346-429 Behavioral Neuroscience Magnetic resonance imaging Image Processing Computer-Assisted medicine Humans Psychiatry lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Biological Psychiatry medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Research fungi General Medicine Voxel-based morphometry Authorship Clinical Practice Meta-analyses Commentary business Region-of-interest Editorial Policies |
| Zdroj: | Behavioral and Brain Functions : BBF Behavioral and Brain Functions, Vol 8, Iss 1, p 46 (2012) |
| ISSN: | 1744-9081 |
| Popis: | No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|