Antiischemic and Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Isradipine, a New Calcium Antagonist, in Coronary Heart Disease: A Comparative Double-Blind Cross-Over Study with Nifedipine
| Autor: | W. Burger, H Herholz, K. Burger, G. Kober |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1990 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Cardiac output Nifedipine Pyridines Physical Exertion Hemodynamics Coronary Disease Angina Double-Blind Method medicine Humans Pulmonary wedge pressure Pharmacology Isradipine business.industry Middle Aged Calcium Channel Blockers medicine.disease medicine.anatomical_structure Blood pressure Anesthesia Vascular resistance Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 16:764-768 |
| ISSN: | 0160-2446 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/00005344-199011000-00011 |
| Popis: | In a double-blind cross-over study, 10 patients with stable angina pectoris owing to coronary heart disease were investigated in supine position during rest and bicycle exercise for the effect of 0.4 mg of intravenous (i.v.) isradipine in comparison to 2 mg i.v. nifedipine on cardiac hemodynamics and myocardial ischemia. At rest, both drugs significantly decreased total peripheral resistance (TPR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), whereas heart rate (HR) increased. The pressures and resistance of the pulmonary circulation remained uninfluenced at rest. During symptom limited-exercise, both medications reduced TPR despite an unchanged MAP. Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased significantly after both medications, whereas right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased significantly only after nifedipine. The improvement of mean ischemic ST-segment depression averaged 44 +/- 6% (mean +/- SEM, p less than or equal to 0.01) after nifedipine and 45 +/- 7% (p less than or equal to 0.01) after isradipine. The time until angina appeared increased after isradipine by 89 +/- 28% (p less than or equal to 0.05) and after nifedipine by 105 +/- 42% (p less than or equal to 0.01). Significant differences between the two medications appeared only for cardiac output (CO) at rest (p less than or equal to 0.05), during which state the increase after isradipine was higher than after nifedipine, and for exercise HR (p less than or equal to 0.01), during which state only nifedipine induced a significant increase in frequency. We conclude that at the chosen dosages the hemodynamic and antiischemic effects of isradipine are similar to the effects that occur after nifedipine. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|