Investigational study of the clinical characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases
Autor: | James Rucinski, Sharon Desales Baoas, Michael E. Zenilman |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
medicine.medical_specialty surgical practice Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) business.industry Mortality rate Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology RC31-1245 peri-operative testing 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine covid-19 Internal Medicine Emerging infectious disease Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Elective Surgical Procedure business Intensive care medicine Research Article Healthcare system |
Zdroj: | Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp 450-456 (2021) Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives article-version (VoR) Version of Record |
ISSN: | 2000-9666 |
DOI: | 10.1080/20009666.2021.1926613 |
Popis: | Background: The COVID-19 is an emerging infectious disease that impacted HealthCare System worldwide and patients undergoing elective surgical procedures is associated with a high mortality rate and a complicated perioperative course. Methods: A retrospective observational study, the research design was conducted utilizing the RedCap ACS COVID-19 Registry and Cerner EMR. The intent of this design is to create statistical information about confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted in an academic institution in Brooklyn, New York from March to May 2020. Results: A total of 1413 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 1413 patients, 520 Expired, 40.5% were males, and 33% were females, p = 0.004. Male patients had high mortality at a rate that is statistically significant. For race of those ‘Expired’, 38.3% white, 34.2% Black, 28.2% Asian, and Unknown 43.6%, showing statistical significance at p = 0.050. The most common co-morbidities for those not-Expired versus Expired: DM, 44.6% expired versus 55.6% not-expired, HTN, 77.1% versus 22.9%, and CAD, 47.9% versus 52.1%. Comparing the data of COVID-19 patients without surgery and with those who had surgery, it was observed that 53% of those who did not have surgery went ‘Home’ versus 38.6%, of those with surgery who could not. Further examining those without surgery versus those with surgery: 3.4% versus 13.3% discharge to ‘Rehab’, for ‘Other discharge’ destinations 5.9% versus 14.5%, and for ‘Expired’ 37.1% versus 31.3%. Overall, the presence of surgery had a significant impact on COVID-19 patients discharge destinations at p = < 0.001. Conclusions: The implications of change in the setting of our current clinical practice therefore require forbearance, training, preparedness, and education to efficiently maintain our essential surgical services. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |