Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with an ultrasound scalpel or laser: is there a difference?
| Autor: | Jukka Antila, H. Salminiitty, Olli Polo, Heikki Antila, H. Aho, Elina Toskala, Perttu Halme |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2009 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Visual analogue scale medicine.medical_treatment Uvulopalatoplasty Young Adult stomatognathic system medicine Humans Ultrasonography Sleep Apnea Obstructive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure business.industry Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Ultrasound Sleep apnea General Medicine Perioperative Airway obstruction medicine.disease Surgery Tonsillectomy Otorhinolaryngology Uvula Anesthesia Pharynx Female Laser Therapy Palate Soft business |
| Zdroj: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 267(4) |
| ISSN: | 1434-4726 |
| Popis: | Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) is used for treatment of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, mainly in the lower range of the apnoea-hypopnea index or partial upper airway obstruction. Significant severe pain after UPPP is associated in the area having surgery and therefore less pain causing methods should be investigated. In this study, we compared laser-assisted and ultrasound scalpel-performed UPPP. Sleep apnoea patients (n = 40) recruited to the study were divided into two groups. UPPP was performed with either laser-assisted or an ultrasound scalpel. Perioperative bleeding, operating room time and duration of operation together with histological injury of soft palate were analysed. A postoperative follow-up questionnaire included a self analysis of pain, dietary intake and pain drug consumption. In the same follow-up form, filled in by patients themselves, possible side effects and adequacy of pain medication together with any postoperative haemorrhage events were recorded during 10-day study period after UPPP. The ultrasound scalpel group had significantly fewer haemorrhagic events (P = 0.037) during postoperative follow-up time after UPPP when compared to laser-assisted group. The pain values of all 40 patients were significantly higher in the morning than in the afternoon (P < 0.001) or evening (P < 0.001). Pain increased up to the fifth postoperative day (visual analogue scale, VAS = 46). The significant relief of pain to the mild level (VAS < 30 mm) occurred at ninth and tenth postoperative day. The ultrasound scalpel used as a surgical method in UPPP did not offer significant comprehensive benefits in this study compared to laser-assisted UPPP. Exclusively, postoperative haemorrhage events were minor, paralleling findings of previous studies where ultrasound scalpel had been used for tonsillectomy. We conclude that the ultrasound scalpel is comparable to laser-assisted UPPP. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink