Sustainability of European winter wheat- and maize-based cropping systems: Economic, environmental and social ex-post assessment of conventional and IPM-based systems

Autor: Bo Melander, F. Leprince, Lise Nistrup Jørgensen, Clotilde Toque, M. Benezit, Donato Loddo, Adrian C. Newton, Maurizio Sattin, W. van Dijk, Vasileios P. Vasileiadis, Imre Holb, Lorenzo Furlan, Caroline Colnenne-David, Roman Kierzek, Marianne Lefebvre, Per Kudsk, Silke Dachbrodt-Saaydeh
Přispěvatelé: Istituto di Agro Ambientale e Forestale di Biologia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche [Roma] (CNR), faculty of Agricultural Sciences - Department of Integrated Pest Management, Aarhus University [Aarhus], ARVALIS - Institut du végétal [Paris], Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Institute of Plant Protection, Veneto Agricoltura, Institute of Agro-Environmental and Forest Biology, Department of Agroecology, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management (GRANEM), Université d'Angers (UA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Agronomie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Plant Protection Institute [Budapest] (ATK NOVI), Centre for Agricultural Research [Budapest] (ATK), Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA)-Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA), The James Hutton Institute, Agriculture and Life Sciences in the Economy Unit [Sevilla] (AGRILIFE), JRC Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Seville] (JRC)-European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Seville] (JRC), Unité Impacts Ecologiques des Innovations en Production Végétale (ECO-INNOV), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), European Project: 265865, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), AgroParisTech-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR), National Research Council of Italy | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), University of Debrecen Egyetem [Debrecen]
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
0106 biological sciences
Integrated pest management
maïs
Yield (finance)
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Social sustainability
Agricultural engineering
Biology
maize
cropping system
01 natural sciences
Integrated Pest Management
12. Responsible consumption
11. Sustainability
Cropping system
système de culture
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
2. Zero hunger
integrated pest management
Agroforestry
triticum
lutte intégrée
Sustainability assessment
Ex-post
integrated protection integrated disease control
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
15. Life on land
Crop rotation
OT Acrres
winter wheat
Maize
Winter wheat
sustainability assessment
13. Climate action
Sustainability
040103 agronomy & agriculture
0401 agriculture
forestry
and fisheries
Arable land
Agronomy and Crop Science
Cropping
010606 plant biology & botany
Zdroj: Crop Protection
Crop Protection, Elsevier, 2017, 97, pp.60-69. ⟨10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.002⟩
Crop protection 97 (2017): 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.002
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Vasileiadis V.P.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S.; Kudsk P.; Colnenne-David C.; Leprince F.; Holb I.J.; Kierzek R.; Furlan L.; Loddo D.; Melander B.; Jorgensen L.N.; Newton A.C.; Toque C.; van Dijk W.; Lefebvre M.; Benezit M.; Sattin M./titolo:Sustainability of European winter wheat-and maize-based cropping systems: Economic, environmental and social ex-post assessment of conventional and IPM-based systems/doi:10.1016%2Fj.cropro.2016.11.002/rivista:Crop protection/anno:2017/pagina_da:60/pagina_a:69/intervallo_pagine:60–69/volume:97
Vasileiadis, V P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S, Kudsk, P, Colnenne-David, C, Leprince, F, Holb, I J, Kierzek, R, Furlan, L, Loddo, D, Melander, B, Jørgensen, L N, Newton, A, Toque, C, van Dijk, W, Lefebvre, M, Benezit, M & Sattin, M 2017, ' Sustainability of European wheat-and maize-based cropping systems : economic, environmental and social ex-post assessment of current and IPM-based systems ', Crop Protection, vol. 97, pp. 60-69 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.002
Crop Protection, 97, 60-69
Crop Protection, 2017, 97, pp.60-69. ⟨10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.002⟩
Crop Protection 97 (2017)
ISSN: 0261-2194
1873-6904
Popis: In order to ensure higher sustainability of winter wheat and maize production in Europe, cropping systems featuring different levels of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) need to be tested in the field and validated for their sustainability before being adopted by farmers. However, the sustainability evaluation of cropping systems is difficult to perform effectively due to the complex economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. Within the EU research project PURE, nine long-term experiments were conducted in various European regions from 2011 to 2014, comparing two IPM levels against the conventional system (CS) in winter wheat- and maize-based cropping systems. IPM1 encompassed some pesticide use in semi-diverse crop rotations while IPM2 favoured reduced- and non-chemical methods in diverse rotations. The modified DEXiPM (DEXi Pest Management) model for arable cropping systems was used for . ex-post assessments to compare the economic, environmental and social sustainability of these systems. The assessments showed that in six out of nine trials the CS was overall unsustainable because of low evaluation of the environmental sustainability that was mainly due to high pesticide use and simplified crop rotations where the choice of crops is primarily market-driven. In contrast, six IPM1 and five IPM2 systems could be classified as sustainable, achieving 'medium' or 'high' scores for all three sustainability dimensions. Differences in the socio-economic conditions across countries and/or climatic and soil conditions across experimental trials highlighted that IPM is based on general principles that must be adapted to address specific local conditions. Overall, IPM systems included more diverse crop rotations and practices compared to the CS, promoting IPM-based strategies with less pesticide use but also a reduced reliance on pesticides that could partially compensate for any yield reductions by the savings on pesticide and application costs. It is recommended that the results of the study should be disseminated to policy-makers, advisors and farmers and that their implementation should be considered on a regional level. Regional policies to encourage the adoption of more sustainable systems based on IPM principles, as well as better support by more closely involving the regional advisory services for the general implementation of IPM is further recommended. . Ex-post analysis with DEXiPM also identified the constraints of the IPM1 and IPM2 systems evaluated as not sustainable. These were related to i) environmental issues for those IPM1 systems that still relied mainly on pesticide use and had less diverse crop rotations, and ii) economic issues for IPM2 systems, mainly due to the choice of less profitable crops in the rotation, as well as to yield penalties caused by the very low pesticide use or replacing pesticides with less effective non-chemical methods. The identification of these constraints is a valuable input to the local and regional discussion on how to adopt IPM and develop more sustainable cropping systems.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: