Importance of training in external beam treatment planning for locally advanced cervix cancer

Autor: Seppenwoolde, Y., Assenholt, M.S., Georg, D., Nout, R., Tan, L.T., Rumpold, T., Leeuw, A. de, Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I., Kirisits, C., Potter, R., Lindegaard, J.C., Tanderup, K., EMBRACE Collaborative Grp
Přispěvatelé: Radiotherapy
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Seppenwoolde, Y, Assenholt, M S, Georg, D, Nout, R, Tan, L T, Rumpold, T, de Leeuw, A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I, Kirisits, C, Pötter, R, Lindegaard, J C, Tanderup, K & EMBRACE Collaborative Group 2019, ' Importance of training in external beam treatment planning for locally advanced cervix cancer : Report from the EMBRACE II dummy run ', Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 133, pp. 149-155 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.012
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 133, 149-155
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 133, 149-155. Elsevier Ireland Ltd
ISSN: 1879-0887
0167-8140
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.012
Popis: Background and purpose: The EMBRACE II study combines state-of-the-art Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in cervix cancer with an advanced protocol for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) which specifies target volume selection, contouring and treatment planning. In EMBRACE II, well-defined EBRT is an integral part of the overall treatment strategy with the primary aim of improving nodal control and reducing morbidity. The EMBRACE II EBRT planning concept is based on improved conformality through relaxed coverage criteria for all target volumes. For boosting of lymph nodes, a simultaneous integrated boost and coverage probability planning is applied. Before entering EMBRACE II, institutes had to go through accreditation. Material and methods: As part of accreditation, a treatment planning dummy-run included educational blocks and submission of an examination case provided by the study coordinators. Seventy-one centers submitted 123 EBRT dose distributions. Replanning was required if hard constraints were violated or planning concepts were not fully accomplished. Dosimetric parameters of original and revised plans were compared. Results: Only 11 plans violated hard constraints. Twenty-seven centers passed after first submission. 27 needed one and 13 centers needed more revisions. The most common reasons for revisions were low conformality, relatively high OAR doses or insufficient lymph node coverage reduction. Individual feedback on planning concepts improved plan quality considerably, resulting in a median body V43Gy reduction of 158 cm 3 from first plan submission to approved plan. Conclusion: A dummy-run as applied in EMBRACE II, consisting of training and examination cases enabled us to test institutes’ treatment planning capabilities, and improve plan quality.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: