Is there any difference between pregnancy results after tubal reanastamosis performed laparotomically, laparoscopically, and robotically?
| Autor: | Erhan Hanligil, Gülhan Elçi, Sena Sayan, Erkan Elci |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Sterilization Tubal medicine.medical_treatment Quadrant (abdomen) Polydioxanone chemistry.chemical_compound Pregnancy Laparotomy medicine Humans Laparoscopy Retrospective Studies medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Anastomosis Surgical General Medicine Odds ratio medicine.disease Confidence interval Surgery Sterilization (medicine) chemistry Female Sterilization Reversal business |
| Zdroj: | Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 15:261-269 |
| ISSN: | 1758-5910 1758-5902 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ases.12991 |
| Popis: | INTRODUCTION Tubal reanastamosis offers hope to conceive again. However, there are many factors that affect the success of this procedure. In our study we aimed to compare the pregnancy rates of the surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis in pregnancy requested after tubal sterilization. METHODS In our study we compared the rates of pregnancies after reanastamosis retrospectively in female patients under the age of 40 who underwent reanastamosis between 2010 and 2019 with laparotomic, laparoscopic and robotic methods. A single layer of 4 quadrant 6/0 number polydioxanone absorbable sutures were used in all surgical methods. A similar surgical technique was used. RESULTS In surgical methods (laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotics), there was a statistical difference between the three groups in terms of operation times of surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text