Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research
Autor: | John Mingers, Jesse R. O'Hanley, Musbaudeen Okunola |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Research evaluation
Computer science media_common.quotation_subject Scientometrics Research excellence framework (REF) 05 social sciences General Social Sciences Subject (documents) Library and Information Sciences 050905 science studies Data science Institutional level Article Computer Science Applications Ranking Research Excellence Framework Quality (business) Google Scholar 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences Citation media_common |
Zdroj: | Scientometrics |
ISSN: | 1588-2861 0138-9130 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11192-017-2532-6 |
Popis: | In recent years, the extent of formal research evaluation, at all levels from the individual to the multiversity has increased dramatically. At the institutional level, there are world university rankings based on an ad hoc combination of different indicators. There are also national exercises, such as those in the UK and Australia that evaluate research outputs and environment through peer review panels. These are extremely costly and time consuming. This paper evaluates the possibility of using Google Scholar (GS) institutional level data to evaluate university research in a relatively automatic way. Several citation-based metrics are collected from GS for all 130 UK universities. These are used to evaluate performance and produce university rankings which are then compared with various rankings based on the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework (REF). The rankings are shown to be credible and to avoid some of the obvious problems of the REF ranking, as well as being highly efficient and cost effective. We also investigate the possibility of normalizing the results for the university subject mix since science subjects generally produce significantly more citations than social science or humanities. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |