Renal effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in patients with diabetes who have progressive renal disease (PLANET I)

Autor: Donald G. Vidt, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Hans-Henrik Parving, Deborah Anzalone, Dick de Zeeuw, John T. Monyak, Michael D. Cressman, Bruce A. Molitoris, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, James R. Sowers, Valerie A. Cain
Přispěvatelé: Groningen Kidney Center (GKC), Methods in Medicines evaluation & Outcomes research (M2O), Real World Studies in PharmacoEpidemiology, -Genetics, -Economics and -Therapy (PEGET)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE
Endocrinology
Diabetes and Metabolism

Atorvastatin
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Type 2 diabetes
Kidney
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
Gastroenterology
GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE
chemistry.chemical_compound
Endocrinology
Diabetic Nephropathies
Rosuvastatin Calcium
education.field_of_study
Sulfonamides
Lipids
Europe
Proteinuria
Creatinine
SAFETY
HEART
medicine.drug
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
NEPHROPATHY
Population
Diabetes Complications
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
Irbesartan
Double-Blind Method
Internal medicine
Internal Medicine
medicine
Humans
Rosuvastatin
Pyrroles
education
METAANALYSIS
Analysis of Variance
IRBESARTAN
Dose-Response Relationship
Drug

business.industry
nutritional and metabolic diseases
South America
medicine.disease
Fluorobenzenes
Pyrimidines
chemistry
LOWERING LDL CHOLESTEROL
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Heptanoic Acids
North America
business
Kidney disease
Zdroj: Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 3(3), 181-190. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
ISSN: 2213-8587
Popis: Summary Background The role of lipid-lowering treatments in renoprotection for patients with diabetes is debated. We studied the renal effects of two statins in patients with diabetes who had proteinuria. Methods PLANET I was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial done in 147 research centres in Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Romania, and the USA. We enrolled patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes aged 18 years or older with proteinuria (urine protein:creatinine ratio [U PCR ] 500–5000 mg/g) and taking stable angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or both. We randomly assigned participants to atorvastatin 80 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, or rosuvastatin 40 mg for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 52 of mean U PCR in each treatment group. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00296374. Findings We enrolled 353 patients: 118 were assigned to rosuvastatin 10 mg, 124 to rosuvastatin 40 mg, and 111 to atorvastatin 80 mg; of these, 325 were included in the intention-to-treat population. U PCR baseline:week 52 ratio was 0·87 (95% CI 0·77–0·99; p=0·033) with atorvastatin 80 mg, 1·02 (0·88–1·18; p=0·83) with rosuvastatin 10 mg, and 0·96 (0·83–1·11; p=0·53) with rosuvastatin 40 mg. In a post-hoc analysis to compare statins, we combined data from PLANET I with those from PLANET II (a similar randomised parallel study of 237 patients with proteinuria but without diabetes; registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00296400). In this analysis, atorvastatin 80 mg lowered U PCR significantly more than did rosuvastatin 10 mg (−15·6%, 95% CI −28·3 to −0·5; p=0·043) and rosuvastatin 40 mg (−18·2%, −30·2 to −4·2; p=0·013). Adverse events occurred in 69 (60%) of 116 patients in the rosuvastatin 10 mg group versus 79 (64%) of 123 patients in the rosuvastatin 40 mg group versus 63 (57%) of 110 patients in the atorvastatin 80 mg group; renal events occurred in nine (7·8%) versus 12 (9·8%) versus five (4·5%). Interpretation Despite high-dose rosuvastatin lowering plasma lipid concentrations to a greater extent than did high-dose atorvastatin, atorvastatin seems to have more renoprotective effects for the studied chronic kidney disease population. Funding AstraZeneca.
Databáze: OpenAIRE