Estimation of risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events from varenicline, bupropion and nicotine patch versus placebo: secondary analysis of results from the EAGLES trial using Bayes factors
Autor: | Emma Beard, Sarah E Jackson, Alok Krishen, A. Eden Evins, Robert West, Robert M. Anthenelli, David Lawrence, Thomas McRae, Neal L. Benowitz, Cristina Russ, Lisa St Aubin |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Research Report
medicine.medical_treatment 030508 substance abuse Medicine (miscellaneous) Medical and Health Sciences Nicotine Substance Misuse chemistry.chemical_compound Bayes' theorem 0302 clinical medicine Nicotinic Agonists 030212 general & internal medicine Varenicline Substance Abuse Tobacco Use Cessation Devices Bayes factor varenicline Psychiatry and Mental health Mental Health 6.1 Pharmaceuticals neuropsychiatric adverse event 0305 other medical science medicine.drug medicine.medical_specialty Nicotine patch Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities bupropion Placebo 03 medical and health sciences Double-Blind Method Clinical Research Quinoxalines Internal medicine Tobacco medicine Humans Adverse effect nicotine patch Bupropion Tobacco Smoke and Health business.industry Prevention Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Neurosciences Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions Bayes Theorem Research Reports Benzazepines Brain Disorders smoking cessation Good Health and Well Being EAGLES chemistry Smoking cessation Drug Abuse (NIDA only) business |
Zdroj: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) Addiction (Abingdon, England), vol 116, iss 10 |
ISSN: | 1360-0443 0965-2140 |
DOI: | 10.1111/add.15440 |
Popis: | Author(s): Beard, Emma; Jackson, Sarah E; Anthenelli, Robert M; Benowitz, Neal L; Aubin, Lisa St; McRae, Thomas; Lawrence, David; Russ, Cristina; Krishen, Alok; Evins, A Eden; West, Robert | Abstract: Background and aimsAnalysed using classical frequentist hypothesis testing with alpha set to 0.05, the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) did not find enough evidence to reject the hypothesis of no difference in neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPSAEs) attributable to varenicline, bupropion, or nicotine patch compared with placebo. This might be because the null hypothesis was true or because the data were insensitive. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis more directly using Bayes factors.DesignEAGLES was a randomised, double-blind, triple-dummy, controlled trial.SettingGlobal (16 countries across five continents), between November 2011 and January 2015.ParticipantsParticipants were smokers with (nn=n4116) and without (nn=n4028) psychiatric disorders.InterventionsVarenicline (1nmg twice daily), bupropion (150nmg twice daily), nicotine patch (21nmg once daily with taper) and matched placebos.MeasurementsThe outcomes included: (i) a composite measure of moderate/severe NPSAEs; and (ii) a composite measure of severe NPSAEs. The relative evidence for there being no difference in NPSAEs versus data insensitivity for the medications was calculated in the full and sub-samples using Bayes factors and corresponding robustness regions.FindingsFor all but two comparisons, Bayes factors were l1/3, indicating moderate to strong evidence for no difference in risk of NPSAEs between active medications and placebo (Bayes factor = 0.02-0.23). In the psychiatric cohort versus placebo, the data were suggestive, but not conclusive of no increase in NPSAEs with varenicline (Bayes factorn=n0.52) and bupropion (Bayes factorn=n0.71). Here, the robustness regions ruled out an≥7% and ≥8% risk increase with varenicline and bupropion, respectively.ConclusionsSecondary analysis of the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study trial using Bayes factors provides moderate to strong evidence that use of varenicline, bupropion or nicotine patches for smoking cessation does not increase the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events relative to use of placebo in smokers without a history of psychiatric disorder. For smokers with a history of psychiatric disorder the evidence also points to no increased risk but with less confidence. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |