Incidence and impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy

Autor: Nicky van der Heijde, Sanne Lof, Olivier R. Busch, Ignace de Hingh, Ruben H. de Kleine, I. Quintus Molenaar, Timothy H. Mungroop, Martijn W. Stommel, Marc G. Besselink, Casper van Eijck
Přispěvatelé: Surgery, Graduate School, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Surgery (United States), 171(6), 1658-1664. Mosby Inc.
Surgery, 171, 6, pp. 1658-1664
Surgery (United States). Mosby Inc.
Surgery, 171, 1658-1664
Surgery (United States), 171(6), 1658-1664. MOSBY-ELSEVIER
ISSN: 0039-6060
Popis: Contains fulltext : 251535.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported a higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy compared to open distal pancreatectomy. It is unknown whether the clinical impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is comparable with that after open distal pancreatectomy. We aimed to compare not only the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, but more importantly, also its clinical impact. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial investigating a possible beneficial impact of a fibrin patch on the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C) after distal pancreatectomy. Primary outcomes of the current analysis are the incidence and clinical impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula after both minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: From October 2010 to August 2017, 252 patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy were randomized, and data of 247 patients were available for analysis: 87 minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and 160 open distal pancreatectomies. The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was significantly higher than that after open distal pancreatectomy (28.7% vs 16.9%, P = .029). More patients were discharged with an abdominal surgical drain after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy compared to open distal pancreatectomy (30/87, 34.5% vs 26/160, 16.5%, P = .001). In patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula, additional percutaneous catheter drainage procedures were performed less often (52% vs 84.6%, P = .012), with fewer drainage procedures (median [range], 2 [1-4] vs 2, [1-7], P = .014) after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis, the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was higher than that after open distal pancreatectomy, whereas the clinical impact was less.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: