Animal welfare management in a digital world
Autor: | Mathieu Silberberg, Harry J. Blokhuis, Isabelle Veissier, Kees Lokhorst, Henry Buller |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 (UMRH), VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
media_common.quotation_subject Review Welfare management [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences Food chain Dierenwelzijn en gezondheid Animal and Dairy Science Animal welfare lcsh:Zoology Quality (business) lcsh:QL1-991 Animal Health & Welfare Productivity media_common 2. Zero hunger lcsh:Veterinary medicine High prevalence General Veterinary Public economics Animal Welfare (journal) business.industry 0402 animal and dairy science 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences 040201 dairy & animal science Agriculture 040103 agronomy & agriculture WIAS lcsh:SF600-1100 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Animal Science and Zoology Precision livestock farming Welfare monitoring Business Welfare assurance Digital Revolution Welfare |
Zdroj: | Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI Animals 10 (2020) 10 Animals Animals, MDPI, 2020, 10 (10), ⟨10.3390/ani10101779⟩ Animals, 10(10) Animals, Vol 10, Iss 1779, p 1779 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2076-2615 |
DOI: | 10.3390/ani10101779 |
Popis: | Simple Summary The digital revolution opens possibilities to use multiple sensors, a data infrastructure and data analytics to monitor animals or their environment 24/7. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) offers significant opportunities for a holistic, evidence-based approach to the monitoring and surveillance of farmed animal welfare. To date, the emphasis of PLF has been on animal health and productivity. If PLF develops further along these lines, there is a risk that animal health and productivity define welfare. A combined multi-actor approach that brings together industry, scientists, food chain actors, policy-makers and NGOs is needed to develop and use the promise of PLF for the creative and effective improvement of farmed animal welfare, not only taking into account their physical welfare but also their mental one. Abstract Although there now exists a wide range of policies, instruments and regulations, in Europe and increasingly beyond, to improve and safeguard the welfare of farmed animals, there remain persistent and significant welfare issues in virtually all types of animal production systems ranging from high prevalence of lameness to limited possibilities to express natural behaviours. Protocols and indicators, such as those provided by Welfare Quality, mean that animal welfare can nowadays be regularly measured and surveyed at the farm level. However, the digital revolution in agriculture opens possibilities to quantify animal welfare using multiple sensors and data analytics. This allows daily monitoring of animal welfare at the group and individual animal level, for example, by measuring changes in behaviour patterns or physiological parameters. The present paper explores the potential for developing innovations in digital technologies to improve the management of animal welfare at the farm, during transport or at slaughter. We conclude that the innovations in Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) offer significant opportunities for a more holistic, evidence-based approach to the monitoring and surveillance of farmed animal welfare. To date, the emphasis in much PLF technologies has been on animal health and productivity. This paper argues that this emphasis should not come to define welfare. What is now needed is a coming together of industry, scientists, food chain actors, policy-makers and NGOs to develop and use the promise of PLF for the creative and effective improvement of farmed animal welfare. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |