The Transcendental Doctrine of Elements
Autor: | Norman Kemp Smith |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2003 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason' ISBN: 9781403915047 A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ ISBN: 9781349044931 |
DOI: | 10.1057/9780230595965_2 |
Popis: | THE Aestltetic opens with a series of definitions. Intuition (Anschauung) is knowledge (Erkenntnis) which is in immediate relation to objects (sich auf Gegenstande unmittelbar bezieht). Each term in this definition calls for comrnent. Anschauung etymologically applies only to visual sensation. Kant extends it to cover sensations of all the senses. The current term was Empfindung. Kant’s reason for introducing the term intuition in place of sensation was evidently the fact that the latter could not be made to cover space and time. We can speak of pure intuitions, but not of pure sensations. Knowledge is used in a very wide sense, not strictly consistent with A 50−1 = B 74−5.1 The phrase sich bezieht is quite indefinite and ambiguous. Its meaning wil1 depend upon the interpretation of its context. Object is used in its widest and most indefinite meaning. It may be taken as signifying content (Inhalt, a term which does not occur in this passage, but which Kant elsewhere employs2). That, at least, is the meaning which best fits the context. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |