Systematic review for the development of a pharmaceutical and medical products prioritization framework
| Autor: | Ma. del Tránsito Salvador Gómez, Ma. Asunción Sagredo Samanes, Alberto Frutos Pérez-Surio, Ma. del Puerto Pardo Jario, Ma. Aránzazu Alcácera López, Mercedes Gimeno-Gracia |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Knowledge management
MEDLINE Short Report lcsh:RS1-441 Context (language use) Pharmacy Medical products lcsh:Pharmacy and materia medica 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Health care 030212 general & internal medicine Justice (ethics) Health priorities Health technology assessment business.industry 030503 health policy & services Health Policy lcsh:RM1-950 lcsh:Therapeutics. Pharmacology Systematic review Conceptual framework Pharmaceuticals Criteria resource allocation 0305 other medical science business Psychology Qualitative research Decision-making |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2019) |
| ISSN: | 2052-3211 |
| Popis: | Objective To identify and analyze the criteria, approaches, and conceptual frameworks, used for national/international priority setting. Data sources We performed a search of the main biomedical databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and Cochrane), and we reviewed assessment agency websites, among other sources. Study design An systematic review of the literature was carried out. Data collection Eligibility criteria for inclusion were based on set of predefined criteria. Systematic reviews and/or qualitative studies (interviews, surveys, expert consensus, etc) that aimed to identify prioritization criteria or develop general operational frameworks for the selection of health priorities were included. A critical analysis is made of all the aspects that may be useful for any public body that intends to establish priorities in health. Principal findings We found that there are no standardized criteria for priority setting, although common trends have been identified regarding key elements. Eight key domains were identified: 1) need for intervention; 2) health outcomes; 3) type of benefit of the intervention; 4) economic consequences; 5) existing knowledge on the intervention/quality and uncertainties of the regarding evidence; 6) implementation and complexity of the intervention/feasibility; 7) justice and ethics; and 8) overall context. Conclusions Our review provides a thorough analysis of the relevant issues and offers key recommendations regarding considerations for developing a national prioritization framework. Findings are envisioned to be useful for different public organizations that are aiming to establish healthcare priorities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-019-0181-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink