Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development - how, what, why and when?

Autor: Krishma Labib, Daniel Pizzolato, Pieter Jan Stappers, Natalie Evans, Iris Lechner, Guy Widdershoven, Lex Bouter, Kris Dierickx, Katinka Bergema, Joeri Tijdink
Přispěvatelé: Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, APH - Aging & Later Life, APH - Quality of Care, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Methodology, Research integrity, Epistemology and Metaphysics, CLUE+, Philosophy of the Sciences
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Labib, K, Pizzolato, D, Stappers, P J, Evans, N, Lechner, I, Widdershoven, G, Bouter, L, Dierickx, K, Bergema, K & Tijdink, J 2023, ' Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development-how, what, why and when? ', Accountability in Research . https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154
Accountability in Research
Accountability in Research. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Labib, K, Pizzolato, D, Stappers, P J, Evans, N, Lechner, I, Widdershoven, G, Bouter, L, Dierickx, K, Bergema, K & Tijdink, J 2022, ' Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development-How, what, why and when? ', Accountability in Research . https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154
ISSN: 0898-9621
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2154154
Popis: Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discusshowco-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to showwhatthe outcome of co-creation methods are. Thirdly, we reflect onwhyandwhenresearchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: