Alternative fuel motor vehicle tailpipe and evaporative emissions composition and ozone potential
| Autor: | Silvestre B. Tejada, Michael Gurevich, Frank Black |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1998 |
| Předmět: |
Air Pollutants
Ozone Waste management business.industry Legislation as Topic Exhaust gas Management Monitoring Policy and Law United States chemistry.chemical_compound chemistry Natural gas E85 Methanol Clean Air Act M85 fuel Gasoline United States Environmental Protection Agency business Waste Management and Disposal Vehicle Emissions |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the AirWaste Management Association (1995). 48(7) |
| ISSN: | 1096-2247 |
| Popis: | The 1988 Alternative Motor Fuels Act and the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments require examination of the potential to favorably influence air quality by changing the composition of motor vehicle fuels. Motor vehicle tailpipe and evaporative emissions were characterized using laboratory simulations of roadway driving conditions and a variety of vehicle-fuel technologies (reformulated gasoline (RFG), methanol (M85), ethanol (E85), and natural gas (CNG)). Speciated organic compound (with Carter MIR ozone potential), CO, and NO(x) emission rates and fuel economy were characterized. The Carter MIR ozone potential of combined Federal Test Procedure (FTP) tailpipe and evaporative emissions was reduced more than 90% with CNG relative to RFG, M85, and E85 fuels. FTP toxic compound emissions (benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-butadiene) were greater with M85 and E85 fuels than with RFG fuel, and less with CNG fuel than RFG fuel. The most abundant toxic compound was benzene with RFG fuel, formaldehyde with M85 fuel, and acetaldehyde with E85 fuel. FTP MPG fuel economies were reduced with M85 and E85 fuels relative to RFG fuel, consistent with their lower BTU/gal. Energy efficiencies (BTU/mi) were improved with all the alternative fuels relative to RFG. Carter MIR ozone potential was generally reduced with the alternative fuels relative to RFG fuel under REP05 (high speeds and acceleration rates) driving conditions (most significantly with CNG). Toxic aldehyde emissions were reduced under REP05 conditions relative to FTP conditions with all the tested fuels, and toxic benzene emissions were elevated under high acceleration conditions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|