Comparison of the success rate of mineral trioxide aggregate, endosequence bioceramic root repair material, and calcium hydroxide for apexification of immature permanent teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Fida Qadri, Izaz Shaik, Jenefer Loveline Arokiyasamy, Rahul Tiwari, Bhargavi Dasari, Mina Doos, Rashmi Kolichala |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Mineral trioxide aggregate
endosequence Dentistry Bioengineering Review Article Bioceramic General Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology chemistry.chemical_compound Pharmacy and materia medica Medicine calcium hydroxide General Pharmacology Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Permanent teeth mineral trioxide aggregate QD71-142 Calcium hydroxide Repair material EndoSequence root repair material business.industry apexification RS1-441 chemistry bioceramic Meta-analysis randomized controlled trials Apexification business Analytical chemistry |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 5, Pp 43-47 (2021) Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences |
| ISSN: | 0975-7406 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_810_20 |
| Popis: | This systematic review aims to compare the success rate of Endosequence bioceramic root repair material (BCRRM), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium hydroxide for apexification of necrotic immature permanent teeth. Indexed Journals such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Research Gate, Wiley Online Library, and other related journals were hand searched from inception till November 2020 and articles were selected for review based on PRISMA guidelines. Of the 410 studies that were identified, 150 articles were selected after title/abstract reading. After full-text reading and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 9 studies were finalized for systematic review. Clinical, radiographic success, and the time taken for apical barrier formation were reviewed. All the three materials had almost similar success rate in terms of clinical symptoms, but the time taken for apical barrier formation and also single visit treatment makes MTA and Endosequence BCRRM superior to calcium hydroxide. Studies comparing EndoSequence Root Repair Material and MTA are very limited and need further evaluation in the future. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |