Comparing the Effectiveness of Bevacizumab to Ranibizumab in Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. The BRAMD Study

Autor: Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Tunde Peto, Greet Dijkman, F. D. Verbraak, Johanna M. M. Hooymans, Reinier O. Schlingemann, Carel B. Hoyng, Johannes R. Vingerling, Ann-Sofie M E Schauwvlieghe
Přispěvatelé: Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NIN), ANS - Cellular & Molecular Mechanisms, Ophthalmology, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Clinical Research Unit, Epidemiology
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
PHARMACOKINETICS
Visual acuity
genetic structures
Physiology
Vision
Visual Acuity
Social Sciences
lcsh:Medicine
Infographics
Sensory disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 12]
law.invention
Macular Degeneration
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Medicine and Health Sciences
Psychology
Geriatric Ophthalmology
lcsh:Science
Multidisciplinary
Pharmaceutics
Research Support
Non-U.S. Gov't

Retinal Degeneration
Middle Aged
Charts
Body Fluids
Multicenter Study
Bevacizumab
Choroidal neovascularization
Treatment Outcome
Research Design
Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Sciences
Retinal Disorders
Sensory Perception
TRIAL
medicine.symptom
Anatomy
Statistics (Mathematics)
medicine.drug
Research Article
medicine.medical_specialty
Computer and Information Sciences
Clinical Research Design
Research and Analysis Methods
03 medical and health sciences
Drug Therapy
Double-Blind Method
Ocular System
Ophthalmology
Ranibizumab
Journal Article
medicine
Confidence Intervals
Humans
Comparative Study
Aged
Intention-to-treat analysis
business.industry
Data Visualization
lcsh:R
Biology and Life Sciences
Macular degeneration
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
eye diseases
Vitreous Body
Geriatrics
Macular Disorders
030221 ophthalmology & optometry
Wet Macular Degeneration
Eyes
lcsh:Q
Adverse Events
sense organs
business
Head
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Mathematics
Neuroscience
Zdroj: PLoS One, 11, 5
PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 5, p e0153052 (2016)
PLoS ONE
PLoS One, 11(5). Public Library of Science
PLoS ONE, 11(5). Public Library of Science
PLoS One (print), 11(5):e0153052. Public Library of Science
PLoS ONE, 11(5):e0153052. PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PLoS One, 11
PLoS ONE, 11(5)
Schauwvlieghe, A M E, Dijkman, G, Hooymans, J M, Verbraak, F D, Hoyng, C B, Dijkgraaf, M G W, Peto, T, Vingerling, J R & Schlingemann, R O 2016, ' Comparing the Effectiveness of Bevacizumab to Ranibizumab in Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. The BRAMD Study ' PloS one, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. e0153052 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153052
ISSN: 1932-6203
Popis: Contains fulltext : 167677.PDF (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Multicentre, randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial in 327 patients. The non-inferiority margin was 4 letters. PATIENTS: Patients >/= 60 years of age with primary or recurrent sub- or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD with a total area of CNV < 12 disc areas and a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 20 and 78 letters on an EDTRS like chart in the study eye. METHODS: Monthly intravitreal injections with 1.25 mg bevacizumab or 0.5 mg ranibizumab were given during one year. Intention to treat with last observation carried forward analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the change in BCVA in the study eye from baseline to 12 months. RESULTS: The mean gain in BCVA was 5.1 (+/-14.1) letters in the bevacizumab group (n = 161) and 6.4 (+/-12.2) letters in the ranibizumab group (n = 166) (p = 0.37). The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference in BCVA gain was 3.72. The response to bevacizumab was more varied; 24% of patients showed a gain of >/=15 letters, 11% a loss of >/=15 letters and 65% a gain or loss < 15 letters compared to 19%, 5% and 76% respectively for ranibizumab (p = 0.038). No significant differences in absolute CRT and CRT change (p = 0.13) or in the presence of subretinal or intraretinal fluid (p = 0.14 and 0.10, respectively) were observed. However, the presence of any fluid on SD-OCT (subretinal and/or intraretinal) differed significantly (p = 0.020), with definite fluid on SD-OCT in 45% of the patients for bevacizumab versus 31% for ranibizumab. The occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events was similar, with 34 SAEs and 256 AEs in the bevacizumab group and 37 SAEs and 299 AEs in the ranibizumab group (p = 0.87 and p = 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab was not inferior to ranibizumab. The response to bevacizumab was more varied with higher percentages of both gainers and losers and more frequently observed retinal fluid on SD-OCT at 12 months when compared to the ranibizumab group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trialregister.nl NTR1704.
Databáze: OpenAIRE