Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Scopus on the Energy Efficiency and Climate Impact of Buildings
| Autor: | Marta Chàfer, Luisa F. Cabeza, Érika Mata |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Technology
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Energías renovables 02 engineering and technology Scientific literature lcsh:Technology 01 natural sciences climate change mitigation Energía solar Climate change mitigation Energy efficiency of buildings 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Scopus Cambio climático Emisiones de CO2 Eficiencia energética Sostenibilidad 3305.90 Transmisión de Calor en la Edificación 3322.05 Fuentes no Convencionales de Energía Renewable energy 3305.14 Viviendas Geography technology 3328.26 Refrigeración Efficient energy use Control and Optimization 1203.12 Bancos de Datos 020209 energy Energy Engineering and Power Technology Ciclo de vida de edificación bibliometric analysis Bibliometric analysis Edificación residencial 3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminación Electrical and Electronic Engineering energy efficiency of buildings Engineering (miscellaneous) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Sustainable development scopus lcsh:T Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment business.industry Energía geotérmica Revisión bibliográfica Environmental economics Web of Science Greenhouse gas Sustainability web of science business Energy (miscellaneous) |
| Zdroj: | Energies; Volume 13; Issue 2; Pages: 409 Energies, Vol 13, Iss 2, p 409 (2020) RIARTE Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica de España (CGATE) Repositorio Abierto de la UdL Universitad de Lleida Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname |
| ISSN: | 1996-1073 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/en13020409 |
| Popis: | Although the body of scientific publications on energy efficiency and climate mitigation from buildings has been growing quickly in recent years, very few previous bibliometric analysis studies exist that analyze the literature in terms of specific content (trends or options for zero‐energy buildings) or coverage of different scientific databases. We evaluate the scientific literature published since January 2013 concerning alternative methods for improving the energy efficiency and mitigating climate impacts from buildings. We quantify and describe the literature through a bibliometric approach, comparing the databases Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. A total of 19,416 (Scopus) and 17,468 (WoS) publications are analyzed, with only 11% common documents. The literature has grown steadily during this time period, with a peak in the year 2017. Most of the publications are in English, in the area of Engineering and Energy Fuels, and from institutions from China and the USA. Strong links are observed between the most published authors and institutions worldwide. An analysis of keywords reveals that most of research focuses on technologies for heating, ventilation, and air‐conditioning, phase change materials, as well as information and communication technologies. A significantly smaller segment of the literature takes a broader perspective (greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle, and sustainable development), investigating implementation issues (policies and costs) or renewable energy (solar). Knowledge gaps are detected in the areas of behavioral changes, the circular economy, and some renewable energy sources (geothermal, biomass, small wind). We conclude that i) the contents of WoS and Scopus are radically different in the studied fields; ii) research seems to focus on technological aspects; and iii) there are weak links between research on energy and on climate mitigation and sustainability, the latter themes being misrepresented in the literature. These conclusions should be validated with further analyses of the documents identified in this study. We recommend that future research focuses on filling the above identified gaps, assessing the contents of several scientific databases, and extending energy analyses to their effects in terms of mitigation potentials. This work was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades de España (RTI2018‐ 093849‐B‐C31), by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme, and by the foundation SIVL. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |