Comparative study of glenoid version and inclination using two-dimensional images from computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed bone models
Autor: | Choi, Chang-Hyuk, Kim, Hee-Chan, Kang, Daewon, Kim, Jun-Young |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
3D measurement
3d measurement 2d images 030222 orthopedics medicine.medical_specialty medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Geography Planning and Development Computed tomography Glenoid version 030229 sport sciences Glenoid inclination Management Monitoring Policy and Law 2D measurement lcsh:RD701-811 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine lcsh:Orthopedic surgery Orthopedic surgery medicine Original Article Nuclear medicine business Reliability (statistics) |
Zdroj: | Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow, Vol 23, Iss 3, Pp 119-124 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2288-8721 |
Popis: | Background: This study was performed to compare glenoid version and inclination measured using two-dimensional (2D) images from computed tomography (CT) scans or three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed bone models.Methods: Thirty patients who had undergone conventional CT scans were included. Two orthopedic surgeons measured glenoid version and inclination three times on 2D images from CT scans (2D measurement), and two other orthopedic surgeons performed the same measurements using 3D reconstructed bone models (3D measurement). The 3D-reconstructed bone models were acquired and measured with Mimics and 3-Matics (Materialise).Results: Mean glenoid version and inclination in 2D measurements were –1.705º and 9.08º, respectively, while those in 3D measurements were 2.635º and 7.23º. The intra-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.605 and 0.698, respectively, while that in 3D measurements was 0.883 and 0.892. The inter-observer reliability in 2D measurements was 0.456 and 0.374, respectively, while those in 3D measurements was 0.853 and 0.845.Conclusions: The difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not due to differences in image data but to the use of different tools. However, more consistent results were obtained in 3D measurement. Therefore, 3D measurement can be a good alternative for measuring glenoid version and inclination. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |