Removing politics from innovations that improve food security
Autor: | C. Ramage, Stuart J. Smyth, Alan McHughen, Wayne A. Parrott, Jon Entine, Drew L. Kershen |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Crops
Agricultural Risk 0106 biological sciences 0301 basic medicine Natural resource economics Process (engineering) Yield (finance) Food Genetically Modified Legislation Review Biology Risk Assessment 01 natural sciences 03 medical and health sciences Biosafety Politics Genetics Humans Uncategorized Science-based Food security business.industry food and beverages Plants Genetically Modified 030104 developmental biology Food Security Genetic modification Food processing Animal Science and Zoology business Risk assessment Agronomy and Crop Science Genome editing Regulation 010606 plant biology & botany Biotechnology |
Zdroj: | Transgenic Research |
ISSN: | 1573-9368 0962-8819 |
Popis: | Genetically modified (GM) organisms and crops have been a feature of food production for over 30 years. Despite extensive science-based risk assessment, the public and many politicians remain concerned with the genetic manipulation of crops, particularly food crops. Many governments have addressed public concern through biosafety legislation and regulatory frameworks that identify and regulate risks to ensure human health and environmental safety. These domestic regulatory frameworks align to international scientific risk assessment methodologies on a case-by-case basis. Regulatory agencies in 70 countries around the world have conducted in excess of 4400 risk assessments, all reaching the same conclusion: GM crops and foods that have been assessed provide no greater risk to human health or the environment than non-GM crops and foods. Yet, while the science regarding the safety of GM crops and food appears conclusive and societal benefits have been globally demonstrated, the use of innovative products have only contributed minimal improvements to global food security. Regrettably, politically-motivated regulatory barriers are currently being implemented with the next genomic innovation, genome editing, the implications of which are also discussed in this article. A decade of reduced global food insecurity was witnessed from 2005 to 2015, but regrettably, the figure has subsequently risen. Why is this the case? Reasons have been attributed to climate variability, biotic and abiotic stresses, lack of access to innovative technologies and political interference in decision making processes. This commentary highlights how political interference in the regulatory approval process of GM crops is adversely affecting the adoption of innovative, yield enhancing crop varieties, thereby limiting food security opportunities in food insecure economies. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |