Short‐term outcomes of robot‐assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video‐assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single‐center retrospective study
Autor: | Rieko Nakamura, Aiko Ishikawa, Yosuke Morimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Tomoyuki Irino, Makiko Ando, Yuko Kitagawa, Norihito Wada, Tetsuya Tsuji, Shuhei Mayanagi, Satoru Matsuda |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Esophageal Neoplasms business.industry Retrospective cohort study Robotics General Medicine Esophageal cancer medicine.disease Single Center Ramie Surgery Esophagectomy Postoperative Complications Treatment Outcome Swallowing Invasive esophagectomy medicine Paralysis Recurrent laryngeal nerve Humans Lymph Node Excision Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures medicine.symptom business Retrospective Studies |
Zdroj: | Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 15:270-278 |
ISSN: | 1758-5910 1758-5902 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND The safety and feasibility of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of RAMIE with extended lymphadenectomy and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in order to investigate the safety and feasibility of RAMIE. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 87 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at our institution between April 2018 and March 2020 was made, assigning 22 in the RAMIE group and 65 in the MIE group. Short-term clinical outcomes and clinical baseline data were compared. RESULTS The baseline characteristics were comparable. No significant difference in median thoracic phase blood loss and median number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes were observed. The median operative time of thoracic approach was significantly longer in the RAMIE group than the MIE group (305 minutes [221-397] vs 227 minutes [133-365], P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |