Gadoxetate Disodium versus Gadoterate Meglumine: Quantitative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Metrics by Using Compressed-Sensing MRI
Autor: | Bram Stieltjes, Elmar M. Merkle, Manuela Moor, Tobias K. Block, David J. Winkel, Carl G Glessgen, Tobias Heye, Daniel T. Boll |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Gadolinium DTPA Male Movement Contrast Media Hemodynamics Respiratory pattern 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Gadoxetate Disodium Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences Meglumine 0302 clinical medicine Bolus (medicine) Organometallic Compounds Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Prospective Studies Respiratory system Prospective cohort study Aged Aged 80 and over business.industry Middle Aged Respiration Disorders Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plethysmography Liver 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female business Nuclear medicine GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE Arterial phase |
Zdroj: | Radiology. 293:317-326 |
ISSN: | 1527-1315 0033-8419 |
DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2019190187 |
Popis: | Background Gadoxetate disodium has been associated with various respiratory irregularities at arterial imaging MRI. Purpose To measure the relationship between gadolinium-based contrast agent administration and irregularities by comparing gadoxetate disodium and gadoterate meglumine at free breathing. Materials and Methods This prospective observational cohort study (January 2015 to May 2017) included consecutive abdominal MRI performed with either gadoxetate disodium or gadoterate meglumine enhancement. Participants underwent dynamic imaging by using the golden-angle radial sparse parallel sequence at free breathing. The quantitative assessment evaluated the aortic contrast enhancement, the respiratory hepatic translation, and the k-space-derived respiratory pattern. Analyses of variance compared hemodynamic metrics, respiratory-induced hepatic motion, and respiratory parameters before and after respiratory gating. Results A total of 497 abdominal MRI examinations were included. Of these, 338 participants were administered gadoxetate disodium (mean age, 59 years ± 15; 153 women) and 159 participants were administered gadoterate meglumine (mean age, 59 years ± 17; 85 women). The arterial bolus of gadoxetate disodium arrived later than gadoterate meglumine (19.7 vs 16.3 seconds, respectively; P < .001). Evaluation of the hepatic respiratory translation showed respiratory motion occurring in 70.7% (239 of 338) of participants who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced examinations and in 28.9% (46 of 159) of participants who underwent gadoterate-enhanced examinations (P < .001). The duration of motion irregularities was longer for gadoxetate than for gadoterate (19.2 seconds vs 17.2 seconds, respectively) and the motion irregularities were more severe (P < .001). Both the respiratory frequency and amplitude were shorter for participants administered gadoxetate from the prebolus phase to the late arterial phase compared with gadoterate (P < .001). Conclusion The administration of two different gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadoxetate and gadoterate, at free-breathing conditions potentially leads to respiratory irregularities with differing intensity and onset. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |