Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
Autor: | G J van Steenbergen, B van Straten, D. van Veghel, Lukas R.C. Dekker, Ka Yan Lam, P A Tonino |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Aortic valve
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Mortality rate Cardiology Mechanical Aortic Valve Retrospective cohort study Cardiothoracic surgery medicine.disease Prosthesis Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Aortic valve replacement Interquartile range ViV-TAVI Medicine Original Article Real-world outcomes Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Redo-SAVR |
Zdroj: | Netherlands Heart Journal |
ISSN: | 1876-6250 1568-5888 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12471-021-01608-0 |
Popis: | Objective We sought to investigate real-world outcomes of patients with degenerated biological aortic valve prostheses who had undergone valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) or reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR) in the Netherlands. Methods Patients who had undergone ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR for a degenerated biological aortic valve prosthesis in the Netherlands between January 2014 and December 2018 were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients with a prior homograft, active endocarditis or mechanical aortic valve prosthesis were excluded. Patients were matched using the propensity score. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital postoperative stroke. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality at different time points, in-hospital postoperative stroke, pacemaker implantation and redo procedures within one year. Baseline characteristics and outcome data were collected from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Results From 16 cardiac centres, 653 patients were included in the study (374 ViV-TAVI and 279 redo-SAVR). European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation I (EuroSCORE I) was higher in ViV-TAVI patients (19.4, interquartile range (IQR) 13.3–27.9 vs 13.8, IQR 8.3–21.9, p Conclusion Patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses treated with ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR have similar mortality and morbidity. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |