Reply to 'Better Method for Evaluating a New Laboratory Test for Syphilis'
| Autor: | Ajda Turhan, Michael Gleich, Martin Enders, Tasanee Sakuldamrongpanich, Annelies Mühlbacher, Vittorio Sambri, Rüçhan Sertöz, Simona Semprini |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Enders, M, Gleich, M, Mühlbacher, A, Sakuldamrongpanich, T, Turhan, A, Sertöz, R, Semprini, S, Sambri, V. |
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
Syphilis laboratory diagnosis Chemiluminescnce assay Computer science business.industry Clinical Biochemistry Immunology Zhàng bacterial infections and mycoses urologic and male genital diseases medicine.disease Laboratory test medicine Immunology and Allergy Syphilis Artificial intelligence business |
| Zdroj: | Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 22:607-608 |
| ISSN: | 1556-679X 1556-6811 |
| DOI: | 10.1128/cvi.00109-15 |
| Popis: | This article is in response to the [correspondence][1] from Zhang et al. ([1][2]) relating to the methodology used in the study by Enders et al. ([2][3]). The correspondence from Zhang et al. does not present a better method. Instead, it criticizes a well-known and widely used method for evaluating |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|