Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population
Autor: | L. Lylloff, Line Tang Møllehave, Niklas Rye Jørgensen, N. Quardon, Y. B. L. Hansen, Allan Linneberg |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Male Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives Procollagen/blood Pathology Aging Peptides/blood Danish population Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Blood Chemical Analysis/methods Bone remodeling Body Mass Index 0302 clinical medicine Blood Specimen Collection/methods Reference Values Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology Vitamin D Blood Specimen Collection Sex Characteristics Middle Aged Bone Remodeling/physiology Cohort BTM Female Bone Remodeling Procollagen Glomerular Filtration Rate Adult medicine.medical_specialty Collagen Type I/blood 030209 endocrinology & metabolism Aging/blood Bone resorption Mean difference Collagen Type I 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult Internal medicine Osteoporosis treatment medicine Humans Bone formation P1NP Life Style Aged business.industry Reference intervals Reproducibility of Results Peptide Fragments 030104 developmental biology CTX business Peptides Peptide Fragments/blood Biomarkers Blood Chemical Analysis Biomarkers/blood |
Zdroj: | Jørgensen, N R, Møllehave, L T, Hansen, Y B L, Quardon, N, Lylloff, L & Linneberg, A 2017, ' Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population ', Osteoporosis International, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2103–2113 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4026-z |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00198-017-4026-z |
Popis: | Summary: Bone turnover markers are used for monitoring osteoporosis treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the agreement between different assays for CTX and PINP and established reference intervals in a cohort of 2300 individuals. We found poor agreement between assays and different reference intervals. This highlights the importance of harmonization of the assays. Introduction: Two reference markers for bone turnover have been proposed: CTX bone resorption and P1NP for bone formation. The purpose of the current study was to establish reference intervals for the two markers in a Danish cohort and to determine the agreement on the two platforms. Methods: Fasting sera from 2308 individuals (1250 males and 1058 females, age range 24–76 years) participating in the Health2006 study were analyzed for CTX and P1NP using the automated IDS-iSYS analyzer and the automated Cobas e411 analyzer. Participants in anti-osteoporotic treatment were excluded, while subjects on hormonal contraceptives were included. Results: There was significant disagreement between both the two P1NP assays with a mean difference of −3 μg/L (LoA −19 to 14) (p < 0.001) and the two CTX assays with a mean difference of 13 ng/L (LoA−187 to 214) (p < 0.001). For CTX, there was a systematic bias: at low values, Cobas measured a higher value than iSYS and at higher concentrations, iSYS measured increasingly higher values than Cobas. Based on the results, we propose three reference intervals for each sex: 25–29, 30–39, and 40–80 years for men, and 25–29, >30 (pre-menopausal), and >30 years (post-menopausal) for women. Conclusions: There is significant disagreement between the IDS-iSYS and Roche Cobas assays for both reference markers. Consequently, the reference intervals for an adult, healthy population are different depending on the analysis method used. Therefore, repeated measurements of patient samples used for monitoring of treatment should be done on the same assay. Moreover, assay-specific reference intervals should be used. Harmonization of assays for BTM is highly warranted. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |